首页> 外文期刊>Spine >The effects of rigid spinal instrumentation and solid bony fusion on spinal kinematics. A posterolateral spinal arthrodesis model.
【24h】

The effects of rigid spinal instrumentation and solid bony fusion on spinal kinematics. A posterolateral spinal arthrodesis model.

机译:刚性脊柱器械和固体骨融合对脊柱运动学的影响。后外侧脊柱关节固定模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Spinal kinematics after the implementation of rigid spinal instrumentation or the achievement of a solid fusion was studied using a sheep posterolateral spinal arthrodesis model. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of rigid spinal instrumentation or solid fusion on spinal kinematic parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Numerous studies have attempted to define spinal instability in terms of kinematics. Recent in vitro studies have documented the neutral zone, or a measure of spinal laxity, as more sensitive to spinal instability than the range of motion. METHODS: Seven skeletally mature sheep underwent a single-level posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis using autologous bone graft augmented with transpedicular screw fixation. The animals were killed 4 months after surgery. The identical surgical procedures were performed in seven sheep cadaveric spines, which served as acute postoperative controls. Each functional spinal unit was tested biomechanically before and after hardware removal. The experimental control groups consisted of destabilized spines and spines that underwent transpedicular screw fixation alone, whereas the fusion groups included spines that underwent posterolateral fusion alone or posterolateral fusion with instrumentation. RESULTS: Rigid instrumentation and solid fusion significantly decreased the neutral zone and range of motion in all testing modes. In axial rotation and lateral bending, solid fusion reduced the range of motion significantly more than transpedicular screw fixation alone. However, in all testing modes, the neutral zones showed no statistical difference between transpedicular screw fixation alone and fusion groups. CONCLUSIONS: The range of motion was an equivalent or better indicator of fixation or fusion stability compared with the neutral zone. Moreover, the immediate postoperative fixation stability, even if using transpedicular screw fixation, was less than the stability present after a solid fusion.
机译:研究设计:使用绵羊后外侧脊柱关节固定术模型研究了实施刚性脊柱器械或实现固体融合后的脊柱运动学。目的:研究刚性脊柱器械或固体融合对脊柱运动学参数的影响。背景数据概述:许多研究试图从运动学角度定义脊柱不稳定性。最近的体外研究表明,中立区或衡量脊柱松弛的程度比运动范围更敏感。方法:七只骨骼成熟的绵羊采用自体骨移植物加经椎弓根螺钉固定进行单水平后外侧腰椎关节固定术。手术4个月后将动物处死。在七个绵羊尸体棘上进行了相同的外科手术,作为急性术后对照。在移除硬件之前和之后,对每个功能性脊柱单元进行了生物力学测试。实验对照组由不稳定的棘和仅经椎弓根螺钉固定的棘组成,而融合组包括仅经后外侧融合或经器械后外侧融合的棘。结果:在所有测试模式下,刚性仪器和固体融合显着减小了中性区和运动范围。在轴向旋转和横向弯曲中,固体融合减少的运动范围比仅经椎弓根螺钉固定更大。但是,在所有测试模式下,中性区在单独经椎弓根螺钉固定和融合组之间均无统计学差异。结论:与中性区相比,运动范围是固定或融合稳定性的等效或更好的指标。此外,即使使用经椎弓根螺钉固定,术后的即刻固定稳定性也低于固态融合后的稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号