首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Magnetic Expansion Control System Achieves Cost Savings Compared to Traditional Growth Rods: An Economic Analysis Model
【24h】

Magnetic Expansion Control System Achieves Cost Savings Compared to Traditional Growth Rods: An Economic Analysis Model

机译:与传统的增长棒相比,磁膨胀控制系统可节省成本:一种经济分析模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design.Medical economic model with multi-way sensitivity analysis.Objective.To compare the direct costs of growing rod (GR) versus Magnetic Expansion Control System (MG) from a payer's perspective. We hypothesized that over time the MG will become more cost-effective.Summary of Background Data.Traditional GRs provide effective treatment, but require periodic lengthening surgery. MG allows rod lengthening in clinic, but the implant is expensive. The cumulative cost savings are not well understood.Methods.Index surgery, implant cost, lengthening procedure, and revision surgery due to implant failure or infection were identified as major parameters contributing to the cumulative cost. The base, low, and high values for the cost and the incidence of each parameter were determined by literature reports, health care database search, or expert consultation. The cumulative cost was compared annually during 5 years of follow-up. Marginal cost was defined as the cost of (GR-MG) for each cumulative year. Final cumulative cost and extreme case scenario at year 5 were assessed by deterministic sensitivity analysis.Results.MG resulted in higher cumulative cost at years 1 and 2, and became lower cost at years 3 through 5. The marginal cost at year 1 was a negative value of $16K, and trended toward positive values of $12K at year 3 and $40K by year 5. Sensitivity analysis revealed that in extreme case, MG could cost more, shown by a marginal cost of $26K by implementing the extreme values of the 3 parameters carrying highest variance: MG-infection management, GR-revision surgery, and GR-lengthening procedure.Conclusion.MG achieved cost neutrality to GR at 3 years after index surgery. This is the first medical economic study in the United States comparing the cost of GR versus MG and demonstrates potential cost-effectiveness of MG from payer's perspective if in place for more than 3 years.Level of Evidence: 2
机译:研究设计,具有多向敏感性分析的医学经济模型,目标,从付款人的角度比较生长杆(GR)与磁膨胀控制系统(MG)的直接成本。我们假设,随着时间的流逝,MG将变得更具成本效益。背景数据摘要传统的GRs可提供有效的治疗方法,但需要定期加长手术。 MG可在临床上延长杆的长度,但植入物价格昂贵。累计成本节省的方法尚不清楚。成本和每个参数的发生率的基本,低和高值是通过文献报告,医疗保健数据库搜索或专家咨询确定的。在随访的5年中,每年比较累积成本。边际成本定义为每个累计年度的(GR-MG)成本。通过确定性敏感性分析评估了第5年的最终累计成本和极端情况方案。价值为1.6万美元,并在第3年趋向于正值12,000美元,到第5年趋向于4万美元。敏感性分析显示,在极端情况下,MG可能会花费更多,通过实施极值,边际成本为26,000美元。 MG感染管理,GR修订手术和GR延长程序是变异最大的3个参数。结论。指数手术后3年,MG对GR的成本保持中性。这是美国第一项将GR与MG的成本进行比较的医学经济研究,并从付款人的角度证明了MG实施超过3年的潜在成本效益。证据级别:2

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号