首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Psychometric evaluation of a decision quality instrument for treatment of lumbar herniated disc
【24h】

Psychometric evaluation of a decision quality instrument for treatment of lumbar herniated disc

机译:决策质量仪器治疗腰椎间盘突出症的心理测评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective and prospective patient surveys and a physician survey using a sample from American Medical Association master file. OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate the performance of a new instrument designed to measure the quality of decisions about treatment of herniated disc. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: There is growing consensus on the importance of engaging and informing patients to improve the quality of significant medical decisions, yet there are no instruments currently available to measure decision quality. METHODS.: The herniated disc-decision quality instrument (HD-DQI) was developed with input from clinical experts, survey research experts, and patients. The HD-DQI produces 2 scores each scaled to 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating better quality: (1) a total knowledge score and (2) a concordance score (indicating the percentage of patients who received treatments that matched their goals). We examined hypotheses relating to the acceptability, feasibility, validity, and reliability of the instrument, using data from 3 samples. RESULTS.: The HD-DQI survey was feasible to implement and acceptable to patients, with good response rates and low missing data. The knowledge score discriminated between patients who had seen a decision aid or no decision aid (55% vs. 38%, P < 0.001) and between providers and patients (73% vs. 46%, P < 0.001). The knowledge score also had good retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.85). Most patients (78%) received treatments that matched their goals. Patients who received treatments that matched their goals were less likely to regret the decision than those who did not (13% vs. 39%, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION.: The HD-DQI met several criteria for high-quality patient-reported survey instruments. It can be used to determine the quality of decisions for treatment of herniated disc. More work is needed to examine acceptability for use as part of routine patient care.
机译:研究设计:使用美国医学会主文件中的样本进行回顾性和前瞻性患者调查以及医生调查。目的:评估一种新仪器的性能,该仪器旨在测量有关椎间盘突出症治疗决策的质量。背景数据摘要:在吸引和告知患者以改善重要医疗决策的质量方面的重要性日益达成共识,但目前尚无可用于衡量决策质量的工具。方法:椎间盘突出质量测定仪(HD-DQI)是根据临床专家,调查研究专家和患者的意见而开发的。 HD-DQI产生2个得分,每个得分从0%到100%,更高的得分表示质量更好:(1)总知识得分;(2)一致得分(表明接受符合其目标治疗的患者的百分比) )。我们使用3个样本的数据检查了与仪器的可接受性,可行性,有效性和可靠性有关的假设。结果:HD-DQI调查是可行的并且可以被患者接受,具有良好的答复率和低丢失数据。知识评分在看过决策辅助或没有决策辅助的患者之间(55%对38%,P <0.001)和提供者与患者之间(73%对46%,P <0.001)进行区分。知识分数也具有良好的重测信度(类内相关系数= 0.85)。大多数患者(78%)接受了与其目标相符的治疗。与未达到目标的治疗相比,未接受治疗的患者后悔决定的可能性较小(13%vs. 39%,P = 0.004)。结论:HD-DQI符合高质量的患者报告调查仪器的多个标准。它可以用来确定治疗椎间盘突出的决策质量。需要做更多的工作来检查是否可以接受作为常规患者护理的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号