首页> 外文期刊>Spine >ISSLS prize winner: Function After Spinal Treatment, Exercise, and Rehabilitation (FASTER): a factorial randomized trial to determine whether the functional outcome of spinal surgery can be improved.
【24h】

ISSLS prize winner: Function After Spinal Treatment, Exercise, and Rehabilitation (FASTER): a factorial randomized trial to determine whether the functional outcome of spinal surgery can be improved.

机译:ISSLS获奖者:脊柱治疗,运动和康复后的功能(FASTER):一项因果随机试验,以确定脊柱手术的功能结局是否可以改善。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, factorial, randomized, controlled trial on the postoperative management of spinal surgery patients, with randomization stratified by surgeon and operative procedure. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine whether the functional outcome of two common spinal operations could be improved by a program of postoperative rehabilitation that combines professional support and advice with graded active exercise commencing 6 weeks after surgery and/or an educational booklet based on evidence-based messages and advice received at discharge from hospital, each compared with usual care. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical interventions on the spine are increasing, and while surgery for spinal stenosis and disc prolapse have been shown to be superior to conservative management, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction are not optimal. METHODS: The study compared the effectiveness of a rehabilitation program and an education booklet for the postoperative management of patients undergoing discectomy or lateral nerve root decompression surgery, each compared with "usual care" using a 2 x 2 factorial design, randomizing patient to four groups; rehabilitation-only, booklet-only, rehabilitation-plus-booklet, and usual care only. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 months, with secondary outcomes including visual analog scale measures of back and leg pain. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-eight patients were recruited into the study and measurements were obtained preoperatively and then repeated at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively. Twelve months postoperatively the observed effect of rehabilitation on ODI was -2.7 (95% CI: -6.8 to 1.5) and the effect of booklet was 2.7 (95% CI: -1.5 to 6.9). CONCLUSION: This study found that neither intervention had a significant impact on long-term outcome.
机译:研究设计:这是一项针对脊柱外科手术患者术后管理的多中心,因子,随机,对照试验,按医生和手术程序进行分层。目的:本研究旨在确定一项术后康复计划是否可以改善两种常见脊柱手术的功能结果,该计划将专业支持和建议与术后6周开始的分级主动运动相结合,和/或基于证据的教育手册,根据出院时收到的消息和建议,分别与常规护理进行比较。背景资料概述:脊柱外科手术正在增加,尽管脊椎狭窄和椎间盘脱出的手术已被证明优于保守治疗,但功能结局和患者满意度并非最佳。方法:该研究比较了康复计划和教育手册对接受椎间盘切除术或侧神经根减压手术的患者进行术后管理的有效性,每种方法均与采用2 x 2因子设计的“常规护理”进行了比较,将患者分为四组;仅康复,仅小册子,康复加小册子和常规护理。主要结局指标是12个月时的Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),其次结局指标包括背部和腿部疼痛的视觉模拟量表。结果:招募了383例患者,进行了术前测量,然后在术后6周,3、6、9和12个月重复进行测量。术后十二个月,观察到的康复对ODI的影响为-2.7(95%CI:-6.8至1.5),小册子的影响为2.7(95%CI:-1.5至6.9)。结论:本研究发现,两种干预均未对长期预后产生重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号