...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >The effect of inspiratory muscles fatigue on postural control in people with and without recurrent low back pain.
【24h】

The effect of inspiratory muscles fatigue on postural control in people with and without recurrent low back pain.

机译:吸入性肌肉疲劳对有和没有复发性下腰痛的人的姿势控制的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A 2-group experimental design. OBJECTIVE: To determine postural stability and proprioceptive postural control strategies of healthy subjects and subjects with recurrent low back pain (LBP) during acute inspiratory muscles fatigue (IMF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: People with LBP use a more rigid proprioceptive postural control strategy than control subjects during postural perturbations. Recent evidence suggests that respiratory movements create postural instability in people with LBP. The role of the respiratory muscles in postural control strategies is unknown, but can be studied by inducing acute IMF. METHODS: Postural control was evaluated in 16 people with LBP and 12 healthy controls, both before and after IMF. Center of pressure displacement was determined on a force plate to evaluate postural stability. Proprioceptive postural control strategies were examined during vibration of the triceps surae muscles or lumbar paraspinal muscles, while standing on both a stable and unstable support surface and without vision. Proprioceptive postural control strategies were determined by examining the ratio of mean center of pressure displacement measured during triceps surae muscles vibration to that measured during lumbar paraspinal muscles vibration. RESULTS.: After IMF, control subjects showed a significantly larger sway compared to the unfatigued condition while standing on an unstable support surface (P < 0.05). IMF induced an increased reliance on proprioceptive signals from the ankles, which resembled the postural control strategy used by people with LBP (P < 0.05). Subjects with LBP showed that same ankle steered postural control strategy in the unfatigued and IMF states (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: After IMF, control subjects use a rigid proprioceptive postural control strategy, rather than the normal "multisegmental" control, which is similar to people with LBP. This results in decreased postural stability. These results suggest that IMF might be a factor in the high recurrence rate of LBP.
机译:研究设计:2组实验设计。目的:确定健康受试者和急性吸气性肌肉疲劳(IMF)时反复出现下腰痛(LBP)受试者的姿势稳定性和本体感受姿势控制策略。背景数据摘要:与LBP患者相比,LBP患者在姿势扰动期间使用更严格的本体感受姿势控制策略。最近的证据表明,呼吸运动会导致LBP患者的姿势不稳。呼吸肌在姿势控制策略中的作用尚不清楚,但可以通过诱导急性IMF进行研究。方法:在IMF之前和之后,对16名LBP患者和12名健康对照者的姿势控制进行了评估。在测力板上确定压力位移中心,以评估姿势稳定性。在站立于稳定和不稳定的支撑表面且没有视力的同时,在肱三头肌或腰椎旁肌肉的振动过程中检查了本体觉姿势控制策略。通过检查腓肠三头肌肌肉振动过程中测得的平均压力中心与腰椎旁肌肉振动过程中测得的平均压力中心之比,来确定本体觉的姿势控制策略。结果:IMF后,与未疲劳状态相比,对照组受试者站立在不稳定的支撑表面上时有明显更大的摆动(P <0.05)。 IMF导致对脚踝本体感受信号的依赖性增加,这与LBP患者所采用的姿势控制策略相似(P <0.05)。 LBP受试者在未疲劳状态和IMF状态下显示了相同的踝关节姿势控制策略(P> 0.05)。结论:IMF后,对照对象使用严格的本体感受姿势控制策略,而不是正常的“多节段”控制,这与LBP患者相似。这导致姿势稳定性降低。这些结果表明,IMF可能是LBP高复发率的一个因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号