首页> 外文期刊>Spine >An evaluation of fracture stabilization comparing kyphoplasty and titanium mesh repair techniques for vertebral compression fractures: is bone cement necessary?
【24h】

An evaluation of fracture stabilization comparing kyphoplasty and titanium mesh repair techniques for vertebral compression fractures: is bone cement necessary?

机译:比较椎体后凸成形术和钛网修复技术对椎体压缩性骨折的骨折稳定性:骨水泥是否必要?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical investigation using human cadaveric vertebral bodies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in biomechanical stability of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) repaired using an expandable titanium mesh implant, with and without cement, as compared with standard balloon kyphoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebral augmentation, either in the form of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty, is the treatment of choice for some VCFs. Polymethylmethacrylate, a common bone cement used in this procedure, has been shown to possibly cause injury to neural and vascular structures due to extravasation, embolization, and may be too rigid for an osteoporotic spine. Therefore, suitable alternatives for the treatment of VCFs have been sought. METHODS: Individual vertebral bodies from 5 human cadaveric spines (from T4 to L5) were stripped of all soft tissues, and compressed at 25% of the intact height using methods previously described. Vertebral bodies were then randomly assigned to the following repair techniques: (1) conventional kyphoplasty, (2) titanium implant with cement, (3) titanium implant without cement. All vertebral bodies were then recompressed at 25% of the repaired height. Yield load, ultimate load, and stiffness were recorded and compared in these groups before and after treatment. RESULTS: There were no differences in biomechanical data between intact groups, and between repaired groups. In all 3 treatment groups, yield load and ultimate load of repaired vertebrae were similar to that of intact vertebrae. However, the stiffness following repair was found to be statistically less than the stiffness of the intact vertebral body (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Based on the biomechanical data, the titanium mesh implant with or without cement was similar to polymethylmethacrylate fixation by kyphoplasty in the treatment of VCFs. Avoiding the adverse effects caused by using cement may be the main advantage of the titanium mesh implant and warrants further study.
机译:研究设计:使用人体尸体椎体进行体外生物力学研究。目的:与标准球囊后凸成形术相比,评估使用可膨胀钛网植入物(有或无骨水泥)修复的椎体压缩性骨折(VCF)的生物力学稳定性差异。背景数据摘要:椎体成形术或后凸成形术形式的椎体隆突是某些VCF的选择治疗方法。聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(一种在该手术中使用的常见骨水泥)已被证明可能由于外渗,栓塞而对神经和血管结构造成伤害,并且对于骨质疏松性脊柱可能过于坚硬。因此,已经寻求用于治疗VCF的合适的替代物。方法:剥去所有5个人体尸体脊椎(从T4到L5)的椎体的所有软组织,并使用前述方法将其压缩至完整高度的25%。然后将椎体随机分配给以下修复技术:(1)传统的后凸成形术,(2)带有水泥的钛植入物,(3)不带有水泥的钛植入物。然后将所有椎体重新压缩至修复高度的25%。记录并比较治疗前后这些组的屈服载荷,极限载荷和刚度。结果:完整组之间和修复组之间的生物力学数据没有差异。在所有三个治疗组中,修复后的椎骨的屈服负荷和最终负荷与完整椎体相似。但是,发现修复后的刚度在统计学上小于完整椎体的刚度(所有比较的P <0.05)。结论:基于生物力学数据,钛网植入物有无骨水泥与经椎体后凸成形术固定聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯在治疗VCF中相似。避免使用水泥引起的不利影响可能是钛网植入物的主要优点,值得进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号