首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Discriminant validity and relative precision for classifying patients with nonspecific neck and back pain by anatomic pain patterns.
【24h】

Discriminant validity and relative precision for classifying patients with nonspecific neck and back pain by anatomic pain patterns.

机译:通过解剖疼痛模式对非特异性颈背疼痛患者进行分类的有效性和相对精度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a previously described cohort of prospective, consecutive patients with acute neck or low back pain referred to outpatient rehabilitation was performed. OBJECTIVE: To estimate discriminant validity and relative precision of two classification procedures (first visit vs multiple visit) in discriminating short-term pain intensity and perceived disability outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Centralization and noncentralization are pain responses used to classify patients and predict outcomes. Different time frames have been proposed for operationally defining these responses, which are problematic for comparing outcomes across clinical trials. Classifying patients according to pain response observed from initial examination (first visit) and over time (multiple visits) influences prevalence within categories and interpretation of classification usefulness, which merits further investigation. METHODS: Patients with acute onset of nonspecific neck or low back pain referred to two outpatient physical therapy clinics completed body pain diagrams, pain intensity ratings, and disability questionnaires at initial evaluation, during each visit, and at discharge. Therapists collected data enabling patient classification on initial examination and throughout treatment. Differences in pain and disability from intake to discharge from rehabilitation across classification categories were used to assess discriminant validity. Relative precision was estimated by determining ratios of analysis of covariance F values between classification procedures for pain and disability. RESULTS: Both classification procedures discriminated categories for change in pain and disability. The multiple-visit classification procedure was more precise for discriminating outcomes than the first-visit classification procedure. CONCLUSION: Multiple-visit classification of patients into specific pain pattern subgroups is recommended when pain intensity and disability outcomes are of interest.
机译:研究设计:对先前描述的一组前瞻性,连续性急性颈部或腰背痛患者进行门诊康复的二级分析。目的:评估两种分类程序(首次访视与多次访视)在区分短期疼痛强度和感觉到的残疾结果方面的判别有效性和相对精度。背景数据摘要:集中和非集中是用于对患者进行分类和预测结果的疼痛反应。已经提出了用于定义这些反应的不同时间框架,这对于比较整个临床试验的结果是有问题的。根据初次检查(首次就诊)和一段时间(多次就诊)中观察到的疼痛反应对患者进行分类,会影响类别内的患病率和分类有用性的解释,值得进一步研究。方法:在两家医院门诊物理治疗诊所就诊的非特异性颈部或腰背痛急性发作患者在初次评估,每次就诊和出院时均完成了身体疼痛图,疼痛强度等级和残疾问卷。治疗师收集的数据可以在初次检查和整个治疗过程中对患者进行分类。不同类别的患者从康复到康复的疼痛和残疾的差异被用来评估判别效度。通过确定疼痛和残疾分类程序之间协方差F值的分析比率来估算相对精度。结果:两种分类程序都区分疼痛和残疾变化的类别。多次访视分类程序比初次访视分类程序更精确地区分结果。结论:当对疼痛强度和残疾结果感兴趣时,建议将患者多次分为特定的疼痛模式亚组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号