首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Identifying the best treatment among common nonsurgical neck pain treatments: a decision analysis.
【24h】

Identifying the best treatment among common nonsurgical neck pain treatments: a decision analysis.

机译:在常见的非手术性颈部疼痛治疗中确定最佳治疗方法:决策分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Decision analysis. OBJECTIVE: To identify the best treatment for nonspecific neck pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In Canada and the United States, the most commonly prescribed neck pain treatments are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), exercise, and manual therapy. Deciding which treatment is best is difficult because of the trade-offs between beneficial and harmful effects, and because of the uncertainty of these effects. METHODS: (Quality-adjusted) life expectancy associated with standard NSAIDs, Cox-2 NSAIDs, exercise, mobilization, and manipulation were compared in a decision-analytic model. Estimates of the course of neck pain, background risk of adverse events in the general population, treatment effectiveness and risk, and patient-preferences were input into the model. Assuming equal effectiveness, we conducted a baseline analysis using risk of harm only. We assessed the stability of the baseline results by conducting a second analysis that incorporated effectiveness data from a high-quality randomized trial. RESULTS: There were no important differences across treatments. The difference between the highest and lowest ranked treatments predicted by the baseline model was 4.5 days of life expectancy and 3.4 quality-adjusted life-days. The difference between the highest and lowest ranked treatments predicted by the second model was 7.3 quality-adjusted life-days. CONCLUSION: When the objective is to maximize life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy, none of the treatments in our analysis were clearly superior.
机译:研究设计:决策分析。目的:确定非特异性颈部疼痛的最佳治疗方法。背景数据摘要:在加拿大和美国,最常用的颈部疼痛治疗方法是非甾体抗炎药(NSAID),运动和手法治疗。由于有益效果和有害效果之间的取舍以及这些效果的不确定性,很难确定哪种治疗方法是最好的。方法:在决策分析模型中比较了与标准NSAID,Cox-2 NSAID,运动,动员和操作相关的(质量调整后)预期寿命。将颈部疼痛的过程,一般人群中不良事件的背景风险,治疗效果和风险以及患者偏好的估计值输入模型。假设有效性相等,我们仅使用伤害风险进行了基线分析。我们通过进行第二次分析来评估基线结果的稳定性,该分析结合了高质量随机试验的有效性数据。结果:各治疗之间无重要差异。基线模型预测的最高和最低治疗之间的差异是预期寿命4.5天和质量调整寿命3.4天。第二个模型预测的最高和最低排名的治疗之间的差异是7.3质量调整的生命日。结论:当目标是最大程度地延长预期寿命和按质量调整的预期寿命时,我们分析中没有一种治疗方法明显优越。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号