首页> 外文期刊>Spine >A randomized trial of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain. Efficacy on sickness absence.
【24h】

A randomized trial of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain. Efficacy on sickness absence.

机译:运动疗法对急性下腰痛患者的随机试验。对疾病缺席的功效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which patients received either usual care by a general practitioner (information and analgesics), or placebo physiotherapy given by a physiotherapist, or exercise therapy given by a physiotherapist. OBJECTIVE. To assess the efficacy of exercise therapy on sickness absence from work in patients with acute low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Exercise therapy during the nonchronic phase of back pain is considered to reduce sickness absence, but this opinion is controversial. METHODS. Patients with acute nonspecific low back pain and a paid job were included for analysis. Sickness absence (number of days) was checked monthly during the 1-year follow-up period and compliance was also assessed. RESULTS. From 40 general practices 363 patients who were gainfully employed were included. In the exercise therapy group the percentage of patients with sickness absence was higher and the duration of absence was longer than in the placebo and usual care groups, but these differences were not significant. Indications of more absence in the exercise therapy group appeared to be based largely on a greater number of patients with absences during the first 3 months. Patients in the exercise group who had not reported sick at entry had more sickness absences during the follow-up year than patients in the usual care and placebo group. Good compliance did not affect the results. CONCLUSIONS. Exercise therapy for patients with acute low back pain does not reduce sickness absence.
机译:学习规划。一项随机,安慰剂对照的试验,其中患者接受普通科医生的常规护理(信息和镇痛药),或由物理治疗师进行的安慰剂物理疗法,或由物理治疗师进行的运动疗法。目的。评估运动疗法对急性下背痛患者因病缺勤的疗效。背景数据摘要。在非慢性背痛阶段进行运动疗法可减少疾病的缺乏,但这种观点引起争议。方法。包括急性非特异性下腰痛和有偿工作的患者进行分析。在1年的随访期内每月检查一次病情消失(天数),并评估依从性。结果。从40种常规做法中,包括363名受雇的患者。与安慰剂和常规护理组相比,运动疗法组中无病患者的百分比更高,无病时间更长,但这些差异并不显着。运动治疗组中更多缺勤的迹象似乎主要是基于前三个月中更多的缺勤患者。与常规护理和安慰剂组相比,运动组中在入院时未报告任何疾病的患者在随访期间的疾病缺勤率更高。良好的依从性不会影响结果。结论。对急性下腰痛的患者进行运动疗法不能减少疾病的缺乏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号