...
首页> 外文期刊>Southern forests: a Journal of forest science >Validation of an efficient visual method for estimating leaf area index in clonal Eucalyptus plantations
【24h】

Validation of an efficient visual method for estimating leaf area index in clonal Eucalyptus plantations

机译:估算桉树无性系人工林叶面积指数的有效视觉方法的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Leaf area index (LAI) is a key ecophysiological parameter in forest stands because it characterises the interface between atmospheric processes and plant physiology. Several indirect methods for estimating LAI have been developed. However, these methods have limitations that can affect the estimates. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and applicability of a visual method for estimating LAI in clonal Eucalyptus grandis x E. urophylla plantations and to compare it with hemispherical photography, ceptometer and LAI-2000((R)) estimates. Destructive sampling for direct determination of the actual LAI was performed in 22 plots at two geographical locations in Brazil. Actual LAI values were then used to develop a field guide with photographic images representing an LAI range of 1.0-5.0 m(2) m(-2) (leaf area/ground area). The visual LAI estimation guide was evaluated with 17 observers in the field. The average difference between actual LAI and visual LAI estimation was 12% and the absolute difference between the two methods was less than or equal to 0.5 m(2) m(-2) in 77% of plots. Pearson's correlation coefficients were high between actual LAI and hemispherical photographs (0.8), visual estimation (0.93) and LAI-2000((R)) (0.99) and low for the ceptometer (0.18). However, absolute values differed among methods, with the average difference between the actual and estimated LAI of [12]% for visual estimation, 28% for the LAI-2000((R)), 37% for the ceptometer and -43% for hemispherical photographs. The LAI-2000((R)) and ceptometer overestimated LAI in all plots, whereas hemispherical photographs underestimated the values in all measurements, showing that these methods need calibration to be used. No differences were observed between actual LAI and visual estimates across stand ages of 2-8 years and LAI of 1.5-5.3 m(2) m(-2) (P > 0.05). The results show that visual estimation of LAI in Eucalyptus stands is a practical method that is unaffected by atmospheric characteristics and can be used on an operational scale.
机译:叶面积指数(LAI)是林分中的关键生态生理参数,因为它表征了大气过程与植物生理之间的界面。已经开发了几种估计LAI的间接方法。但是,这些方法有可能影响估计的局限性。这项研究的目的是评估一种视觉方法估计克隆的桉树x尾叶桉人工林中LAI的准确性和适用性,并将其与半球摄影,感知器和LAI-2000(R)估计进行比较。在巴西两个地理位置的22个地块中,进行了直接确定实际LAI的破坏性抽样。然后将实际LAI值用于开发具有表示LAI范围为1.0-5.0 m(2)m(-2)(叶面积/地面面积)的摄影图像的野外指南。视觉LAI估算指南由该领域的17位观察员进行了评估。实际LAI和视觉LAI估计之间的平均差异为12%,两种方法之间的绝对差异在77%的地块中小于或等于0.5 m(2)m(-2)。实际LAI和半球形照片之间的Pearson相关系数较高(0.8),视觉估计(0.93)和LAI-2000(R)(0.99)较低,而接受度表的相关系数较低(0.18)。但是,方法之间的绝对值有所不同,对于视觉估计,实际LAI与估计LAI之间的平均差异为[12]%,对于LAI-2000(R))为28%,对于接受度计为37%,对于-AI为-43%半球照片。 LAI-2000(R)和感知器在所有图中都高估了LAI,而半球照片低估了所有测量值,表明这些方法需要校准。在2-8年的林分年龄和1.5-5.3 m(2)m(-2)的LAI中,实际LAI和视觉估计之间没有观察到差异(P> 0.05)。结果表明,目测估算桉树林分中的LAI是一种不受大气特征影响的实用方法,可以在操作规模上使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号