...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil Science Society of America Journal >Influence of Soil Amendment History on Decomposition of Recently Applied Organic Amendments
【24h】

Influence of Soil Amendment History on Decomposition of Recently Applied Organic Amendments

机译:土壤改良剂历史对最近应用的有机改良剂分解的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Long-term use of organic soil amendments, compared with unamended or mineral fertilized soils, can change soil organic matter content, microbial biomass content, the microbial community structure, and the activity of enzymes involved in organic matter decomposition. It is not clear, however, whether long-term use of organic amendments, by means of these changes, leads to modified decomposition rates of newly added organic amendments. Therefore, this study was used to test the hypothesis that amendment history has an influence only on the decomposition of recalcitrant organic amendments and not on less recalcitrant organic amendments. Soils used for experimentation were taken from a field experiment where contrasting organic amendment regimes of farmyard manure, pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) bark, vegetable crop residues, and an unamended control had been applied for 35 yr. In a full factorial, laboratory-based incubation experiment, each soil was treated with each of these amendments and net C and N mineralization and microbial biomass C contents were monitored during a 147-d period. Collected data were then used to estimate gross turnover rates of newly added amendments with a modeling approach based on the soil organic matter module of the Daisy model. The modeling results suggested that the turnover of farmyard manure and pine bark, not however of crop residues, should be simulated in consideration of an amendment history effect. In contrast, the results of the ANOVA indicated that amendment history had an insignificant effect on net C and N mineralization from recently applied amendment. We concluded that the effects of amendment history on gross turnover rates of recently added organic amendments may depend on the type of amendment but that these effects on net C and N mineralization are minor in magnitude and hence irrelevant to N fertilization practice.
机译:与未改良或矿物施肥的土壤相比,长期使用有机土壤改良剂可以改变土壤有机质含量,微生物生物量含量,微生物群落结构以及参与有机物分解的酶的活性。然而,尚不清楚通过这些改变长期使用有机修饰物是否会导致新添加的有机修饰物的分解速率发生变化。因此,本研究用于检验以下假设:修正历史仅对难降解有机修饰物的分解产生影响,而对难降解有机修饰物的影响较小。用于试验的土壤取自田间试验,在该试验中对比了有机肥料,松树(Pinus sylvestris L.)树皮,蔬菜作物残留物和未经修正的对照的有机改良方案,历时35年。在基于实验室的全因子培养实验中,每种土壤都经过了这些改良剂的处理,并且在147天的时间内对C和N的净矿化和微生物量C的含量进行了监测。然后使用收集的数据通过基于雏菊模型的土壤有机质模块的建模方法来估算新添加的修正剂的总周转率。模拟结果表明,应考虑修正历史效应来模拟农家肥和松树皮的周转率,而不是作物残渣的周转率。相反,方差分析的结果表明,修订历史对最近应用的修订对净C和N矿化的影响不显着。我们得出的结论是,修订历史对最近添加的有机修订的总周转率的影响可能取决于修订的类型,但是这些对净C和N矿化作用的影响较小,因此与施氮实践无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号