...
首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Why they cannot work together: a study of the co-management of natural resources with indigenous people in Taiwan.
【24h】

Why they cannot work together: a study of the co-management of natural resources with indigenous people in Taiwan.

机译:他们为什么不能一起工作:与台湾土著人民共同管理自然资源的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study explores the reasons for the failure to establish co-managed protected areas (CMPAs) in Taiwan despite supporting legislation being in place since the early 2000 s. The study adopts qualitative research methods to examine the case of the proposed Lumpi CMPA, in which the local indigenous people failed to persuade the government's district forest-management authority to designate a natural protected area under co-management arrangements in accordance with legislation. The study finds that insufficient motivation and its concerns about loss of control over forest management caused the district authority to snub the proposed co-management arrangements with the indigenous people. Although a legal basis for co-management clearly exists, it is apparent that Taiwanese authorities can avoid the intention of the legislation by administrative maneuvers. The study concludes that a combination of greater political will and more comprehensive legislation is required if CMPAs are to be established in Taiwan.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.630338
机译:这项研究探讨了尽管自2000年代初以来就已制定了相关立法,但未能在台湾建立共同管理的保护区的原因。该研究采用定性研究方法来研究拟议的隆比CMPA案,在该案中,当地原住民未能说服政府的地区森林管理当局根据法律在共同管理安排下指定自然保护区。该研究发现,动力不足以及对森林管理失去控制的担忧导致该地区当局与土著人民不顾拟议的共同管理安排。尽管明确存在共同管理的法律基础,但显然台湾当局可以通过行政手段避免立法的意图。研究得出的结论是,要在台湾建立CMPA,必须结合更大的政治意愿和更全面的立法。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.630338

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号