首页> 外文期刊>Soil Biology & Biochemistry >Responses of biological soil crusts to sand burial in a revegetated area of the Tengger Desert, Northern China
【24h】

Responses of biological soil crusts to sand burial in a revegetated area of the Tengger Desert, Northern China

机译:中国北方腾格里荒漠植被区生物土壤结皮对埋葬的响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Little information is available regarding the responses of biological soil crusts to sand burial in desert ecosystems. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the effects of sand burial (sand depth of 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm) followed by simulated precipitation (1, 3 and 5 mm distilled water, sprayed at 2-day intervals) on CO2 exchange and growth by four types of crust collected from a revegetated area of the Tengger Desert (Northern China) in 2007. The results revealed that the respiration rate was significantly decreased and that moss shoot elongation was significantly increased (P < 0.001) following burial. Both of these responses may have acted as compensatory mechanisms that favoured the recovery of crust after burial. The burial responses among the four crusts were also compared by measuring the cryptogam cover variations after burial and then computing the speed of emergence and a tolerance index (by standardizing the speed of emergence with a burial ratio of sand burial depth to the initial maximum height of the crust). Among the four crusts evaluated, Bryum argenteum crust showed the fastest speed of emergence (average 11.5% cover week-1) and highest tolerance index (average 0.182), followed by Didymodon vinealis crust (emergence, 11.3% week-1; tolerance, 0.129), Syntrichia caninervis crust (emergence, 7.7% week-1; tolerance, 0.097) and Collema tenax crust (emergence, 4.2% week-1; tolerance, 0.022). This sequence was in agreement with the successional order of these crusts that has been observed in the revegetated area evaluated in this study, which suggests that sand burial is one of the most important factors driving the succession of crusts in desert ecosystems. Furthermore, water played a role in the recovery process, as evidenced by pronounced decreases in dark respiration and increases in photosynthesis, speed of emergence and tolerance index for each crust type, as well as by shoot elongations by three mosses in response to the accretion of water. The restriction of tolerance against sand burial under limited precipitation conditions emphasizes the necessity for sand-binding measures to alleviate the negative effects of sand burial on crusts, which are crucial to preventing revegetated areas from undergoing desertification.
机译:关于沙漠生态系统中生物土壤结皮对沙埋的响应的信息很少。因此,在这项研究中,我们评估了沙埋(沙土深度分别为0、1、2、3和4毫米)随后模拟降水(分别以2天为间隔喷洒的1、3和5毫米蒸馏水)的影响。 2007年从腾格里沙漠(中国北方)一个植被恢复地区收集的四种类型的硬皮进行的二氧化碳交换和生长。结果表明,埋葬后,呼吸速率显着下降,苔藓枝伸长显着增加(P <0.001) 。这两种反应都可能是补偿机制,有利于埋葬后恢复硬皮。还通过测量埋葬后隐隐岩层的变化,然后计算出土的速度和耐受指数(通过用沙土埋深的埋藏比与初始最大高度的比率来标准化出土的速度),来比较四个地壳之间的埋葬响应。地壳)。在所评估的四个地壳中,阿根廷黑菜皮的出苗速度最快(平均覆盖第1周为11.5%),耐受性指数最高(平均为0.182),其次是迪迪莫藤藤(出现,第1周为11.3%;耐受性为0.129)。 ),Syntrichia caninervis结皮(出现,7.7%,第1周;耐受性,0.097)和Collema tenax结皮(出现,4.2%,第1周;耐受性,0.022)。该顺序与在本研究评估的植被恢复地区观察到的这些硬皮的演替顺序一致,这表明埋葬是驱动沙漠生态系统中硬皮演替的最重要因素之一。此外,水在恢复过程中也起着一定作用,如黑呼吸的明显减少和每种结壳类型的光合作用,出苗速度和耐受指数的增加,以及三种苔藓对芽孢的吸收而引起的枝条伸长所证明。水。在有限的降水条件下限制对沙埋的耐受性强调了采取束缚措施以减轻沙埋对地壳的负面影响的必要性,这对于防止植被覆盖地区进行荒漠化至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号