首页> 外文期刊>Soil Biology & Biochemistry >Re-establishment of suppressiveness to soil- and air-borne diseases by re-inoculation of soil microbial communities
【24h】

Re-establishment of suppressiveness to soil- and air-borne diseases by re-inoculation of soil microbial communities

机译:通过重新接种土壤微生物群落来重新建立对土壤和空气传播疾病的抑制作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to investigate the potentials and limitations in restoring soil suppressiveness in disturbed soils. Soils from three sites in UK and Switzerland (STC, REC, THE) differing in their level of suppressiveness to soil-borne and air-borne diseases were d-irradiated and this soil matrix was re-inoculated with 1% (w/w) of either parent native soil or native soil from the other sites (soil inoculum). Suppressiveness to air-borne and soil-borne diseases was quantified by means of the hostpathogen systems Lepidium sativum (cress)Pythium ultimum, an oomycete causing root rot and seedling damping-off, and Arabidopsis thalianaHyaloperonospora parasitica, an oomycete causing downy mildew. Soil microbial biomass, activity and community structure, as determined by phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiles, were measured in native, d-irradiated, and re-inoculated soils. Both, L. sativum and A. thaliana were highly susceptible to the pathogens if grown on d-irradiated soils. Re-inoculation completely restored suppressiveness of soils to the foliar pathogen H. parasitica, independently of soil matrix or soil inoculum, whereas suppressiveness to P. ultimum depended on the soil matrix and, to a lesser extent, on the soil inoculum. However, the soil with the highest inherent suppressiveness did not reach the initial level of suppressiveness after re-inoculation. In addition, native microbial populations as defined by microbial biomass, activity and community structure, could not be fully restored in re-inoculated soils. As for suppressiveness to P. ultimum, the soil matrix, rather than the source of soil inoculum was identified as the key factor for re-establishing the microbial community structure. Our data show that soils do not or only slowly fully recover from sterilisation by d-irradiation, indicating that agricultural soil management practices such as soil fumigation or heat treatments frequently used in vegetable cropping should be avoided.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查恢复受干扰土壤中土壤抑制性的潜力和局限性。对来自英国和瑞士三个地点(STC,REC,THE)的土壤传播和空气传播疾病的抑制程度不同的土壤进行d辐射,并向该土壤基质中重新接种1%(w / w)的土壤母本土或其他地点的土(土壤接种物)。空气传播和土壤传播疾病的抑制作用通过寄主病原体系统Lepidium sativum(cress)Pythium ultimum(导致根腐烂和幼苗脱落的卵菌)和拟南芥(Arabidopsis thaliana)Hyaloperonospora parasitica(引起霜霉病的卵菌)进行定量。在天然,d辐射和重新接种的土壤中,通过磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)谱测定了土壤微生物的生物量,活性和群落结构。如果在d照射的土壤中生长,那么L. sativum和A. thaliana都对病原体高度敏感。重新接种完全独立于土壤基质或土壤接种物而完全恢复了土壤对叶状病原体H.的抑制性,而对终极疟原虫的抑制性取决于土壤基质,并且在较小程度上取决于土壤接种物。但是,固有接种率最高的土壤在重新接种后仍未达到初始抑制率。此外,由微生物生物量,活性和群落结构定义的原生微生物种群无法在重新接种的土壤中得到完全恢复。至于对P. ultimum的抑制作用,土壤基质而不是土壤接种物来源被确定为重建微生物群落结构的关键因素。我们的数据表明,土壤不能或仅能缓慢地从D辐射灭菌中完全恢复过来,这表明应避免农业土壤管理措施,例如土壤熏蒸或蔬菜种植中经常使用的热处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号