首页> 外文期刊>Soil & Tillage Research >Are standard values the best choice? A critical statement on rheological soil fluid properties viscosity and surface tension. (Special Issue: Development of soil structure and functions: How can mechanical and hydraulic approaches contribute to quantify soil structure dynamics?)
【24h】

Are standard values the best choice? A critical statement on rheological soil fluid properties viscosity and surface tension. (Special Issue: Development of soil structure and functions: How can mechanical and hydraulic approaches contribute to quantify soil structure dynamics?)

机译:标准值是最佳选择吗?关于流变土壤流体特性粘度和表面张力的重要陈述。 (特刊:土壤结构和功能的发展:机械和水力方法如何有助于量化土壤结构动力学?)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The rheological properties of a fluid in terms of viscosity eta and surface tension gamma are often neglected in studies on hydrostatic and hydrodynamic phenomena. However, their measurement seems to provide us with more benefit than it takes time and effort. Especially regarding transport of fluids in soil, the exact definition of the fluid properties is necessary for predicting water transport correctly. In this paper we review and summarize the available scientific knowledge on rheological soil fluid properties and supplement it with our own investigations on viscosity and surface tension of salt and soil solutions. Our results showed neither a clear linear relationship between eta and salt concentration in aqueous solutions nor to the kind of cation or anion of the dissolved salt whereas the surface tension of salt solutions generally increased linearly with molar concentration though at different rates. As an example, a 1 M MgSO4 solution doubled eta but increased gamma only by 3%, whereas 1 M MgCl2 caused 4% increase in gamma , but still 50% increase in eta . Viscosity of soil solutions depended on soil-water ratio as well as fertilization of the soil. The largest deviation to standard eta of water was about 6% at 40% gravimetric water content. Concluding from the literature review and our own findings, we recommend to additionally measure rheology (namely viscosity and surface tension) of the soil solution in order to improve modeling of hydrostatic and hydrodynamic phenomena in soils by utilizing more realistic fluid properties which might deviate significantly from the usually employed standard values. The mathematical error cumulates with increasing salt concentration as a deviation of 10% to the standard value also causes an error of 10% in linear relationships derived from that parameter, e.g. the equation of Hagen-Poiseuille. Future investigations should focus on the manifold single effects as well as on the interactions of different dissolved components in the soil solution on viscosity and surface tension and how these are influenced by temperature, pressure (i.e. shear rate) and concentration.
机译:在流体静力学和流体动力学现象的研究中,就粘度η和表面张力γ而言,流体的流变特性常常被忽略。但是,他们的衡量似乎比花费时间和精力为我们提供了更多的好处。特别是关于土壤中的流体传输,必须正确定义流体性质才能正确预测水的传输。在本文中,我们回顾并总结了有关流变土壤流体特性的科学知识,并用我们自己对盐和土壤溶液的粘度和表面张力的研究加以补充。我们的结果表明,水溶液中的eta和盐浓度之间既没有明确的线性关系,也没有溶解盐中的阳离子或阴离子的种类,而盐溶液的表面张力通常随摩尔浓度线性增加,尽管速率不同。例如,1 M MgSO 4 溶液使eta值翻倍,但伽马仅增加3%,而1 M MgCl 2 导致γ增加4%,但仍为50%增加eta。土壤溶液的粘度取决于土壤与水的比例以及土壤的肥力。在40%重量的水含量下,与标准eta水的最大偏差约为6%。从文献综述和我们的发现得出的结论中,我们建议另外测量土壤溶液的流变性(即粘度和表面张力),以便通过利用更实际的流体特性(可能与实际情况有很大不同)来改善土壤中的流体静力学和流体动力学现象的模型。通常采用的标准值。数学误差随着盐浓度的增加而累积,因为与标准值的偏差为10%,还会导致从该参数得出的线性关系中的误差为10%,例如Hagen-Poiseuille的等式。未来的研究应集中在多种单一作用以及土壤溶液中不同溶解组分对粘度和表面张力的相互作用以及温度,压力(即剪切速率)和浓度如何影响这些作用上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号