首页> 外文期刊>Skin research and technology: official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) >Cleansing, dehydrating, barrier-damaging and irritating hyperaemising effect of four detergent brands: comparative studies using standardised washing models.
【24h】

Cleansing, dehydrating, barrier-damaging and irritating hyperaemising effect of four detergent brands: comparative studies using standardised washing models.

机译:四个洗涤剂品牌的清洁,脱水,破坏屏障和刺激过度的效果:使用标准化洗涤模型的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PROBLEM: It is well known that the damaging effect of surfactants on the stratum corneum varies according to the surfactant used. The present investigations aim to compare four standard commercial cleansing solutions (Esemptan Cleansing Lotion, Stephalen Shower Gel, Manipur Antimicrobial Cleansing Solution and Tork Mevon 55 Liquid Soap) with respect to their cleansing and skin barrier-damaging effects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cleansing effect of the solutions was determined in relation to their concentrations in a first experimental series involving 15 subjects using a standardised test method. The product concentrations with the most divergent cleansing effects were tested for their dehydrating (corneometry), epidermal barrier-damaging (TEWL) and irritating effects (laser Doppler) in a standardised washing test. In a second experimental series, the concentration used for the cleansing solutions was based on the quantity of cleansing solution obtained from dispenser actuations (six actuations/L). These concentrations were used to test the cleansing and damaging effect on the stratum corneum using the same methods as in the first experimental series. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the first experimental series. In the second experimental series, Stephalen Shower Gel showed disadvantages in terms of a small cleansing effect, but without evidence of a smaller stratum corneum-damaging effect, and Tork Mevon 55 Liquid Soap showed advantages in terms of a smaller stratum corneum-damaging effect, but without evidence of a smaller cleansing effect. CONCLUSIONS: These studies showed that the relationship between the cleansing and the damaging effect on the stratum corneum can be properly assessed only by testing different concentrations. Furthermore, this experimental approach allowed to differentiate the four tested cleansing solutions.
机译:背景和问题:众所周知,表面活性剂对角质层的破坏作用随所使用的表面活性剂而变化。本研究旨在比较四种标准的商业清洁溶液(Esemptan清洁乳液,Stephalen沐浴露,Manipur抗菌清洁溶液和Tork Mevon 55液体肥皂)在清洁和破坏皮肤屏障方面的效果。材料和方法:使用标准化测试方法,在涉及15名受试者的第一个实验系列中,根据溶液的浓度确定溶液的清洁效果。在标准化洗涤测试中,对清洁效果差异最大的产品浓度进行了脱水(角质测定),表皮屏障破坏(TEWL)和刺激性影响(激光多普勒)测试。在第二个实验系列中,用于清洁溶液的浓度基于从分配器驱动(六个驱动/ L)获得的清洁溶液的量。使用与第一个实验系列相同的方法,将这些浓度用于测试对角质层的清洁和破坏作用。结果:在第一个实验系列中没有显着差异。在第二个实验系列中,Stephalen沐浴露在清洁效果小方面显示出劣势,但没有证据表明损害角质层的效果更小,而Tork Mevon 55液体皂在损害角质层效果小方面表现出优势,但没有明显的清洁效果的证据。结论:这些研究表明,清洁和损害角质层的作用之间的关系只能通过测试不同的浓度来适当地评估。此外,这种实验方法可以区分四种经过测试的清洁溶液。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号