...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil & Tillage Research >Root reinforcement effect of different grass species: A comparison between experimental and models results
【24h】

Root reinforcement effect of different grass species: A comparison between experimental and models results

机译:不同草种的根系增强效应:实验结果与模型结果的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Root systems effects along the slopes are widely investigated with the aim to quantify the contribution to prevent soil erosion. Previous studies and methodologies have been carried out to estimate the additional cohesion provided by roots to the soil. In this research five grass species were tested, two of them (Festuca pratensis and Lolium perenne) belonging to the Poaceae family, while Trifolium pratense, Lotus corniculatus and Medicago sativa are three species of the Fabaceae family. We realized in situ tests in order to quantify the contribution of the root system to the soil shear strength, and laboratory tests estimated the root tensile strength of the different species. Laboratory data and root area ratio (RAR) values, measured during the field tests, were used to implement the models of Wu et al. [Wu, T.H., Mckinnell, W.P., Swanston, D.N., 1979. Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince Of Wales Island, Alaska. Can. Geotech. J. 16, 19-33], and of Pollen and Simon [Pollen, N., Simon, A., 2005. Estimating the mechanical effects of riparian vegetation on stream bank stability using a fiber bundle model. Water Resour. Res. 41]. These models are widely used in the literature to simulate the roots behavior in soil during a shallow landslide phenomenon. The in situ measured shear strength values were compared with the models outcomes, verifying if the models describe well the natural behavior of the five tested species. The experimental tests provided a measured value about the effective increase (in percentage) of soil shear strength at 10 cm depth, due to the presence of root systems (i.e. the percentage increase given by T. pratense is 515%). Some discrepancies between the experimental tests and the models results became visible. The applied models do not account for some complex factors involved in the soil reinforcement. The root-soil matrix should thus be characterized by mechanisms not fully captured by the W&W and FBM models
机译:广泛研究了斜坡上的根系影响,目的是量化防止水土流失的作用。已经进行了先前的研究和方法来估计根对土壤提供的附加内聚力。在这项研究中,对5种草种进行了测试,其中的2种(大麦草(Festuca pratensis)和黑麦草(Lolium perenne))属于禾本科(Paceacea),而白三叶(Trifolium pratense),莲花角Lotus(Lotus corniculatus)和紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)是豆科的3种。为了量化根系对土壤剪切强度的贡献,我们实现了原位测试,而实验室测试估计了不同物种的根系抗张强度。在田间试验中测得的实验室数据和根面积比(RAR)值用于实施Wu等人的模型。 [Wu,T.H.,Mckinnell,W.P.,D.N.斯旺斯顿,1979年。阿拉斯加威尔士亲王岛的树根和山体滑坡强度。能够。 Geotech。 J. 16,19-33]和Pollen and Simon [Pollen,N.,Simon,A.,2005。使用纤维束模型估算河岸植被对河岸稳定性的机械效应。水资源。 Res。 41]。这些模型在文献中广泛用于模拟浅层滑坡现象期间土壤的根系行为。将现场测量的剪切强度值与模型结果进行比较,验证模型是否很好地描述了五个被测物种的自然行为。由于根系的存在,实验测试提供了有关10 cm深度土壤抗剪强度有效增加(以百分比表示)的测量值(即T. pratense给出的增加百分比为515%)。实验测试和模型结果之间的一些差异变得显而易见。应用的模型没有考虑到土壤加固中涉及的一些复杂因素。因此,根部土壤矩阵的特征应在于W&W和FBM模型无法完全捕捉的机制

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号