首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Are conservation biologists working too hard?
【24h】

Are conservation biologists working too hard?

机译:保护生物学家是否太努力了?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The quintessential scientist is exceedingly hardworking and antisocial, and one who would spend countless evenings and weekends buried under her/his microscopes and manuscripts. In an attempt to bust this popular myth, we analyzed the work habits of conservation biologists using data from Biological Conservations online manuscript submission system, which includes more than 10,000 manuscript submissions and almost 15,000 reviews from between 2004 and 2012. We found that 11% of new manuscripts and 12% of manuscript reviews were submitted on weekends. Weekend submission rates increased by 5% and 6% for new manuscripts and reviews respectively per year during the study period. Chinese and Indian biologists worked the most on weekends compared to their colleagues elsewhere, submitting 19% of their manuscripts on Saturdays and Sundays. At the other end of the spectrum, Belgians and Norwegians submitted only 4% of manuscripts on weekends. Czech and Polish biologists were the most assiduous weekend reviewers, submitting 27% and 25% of reviews on weekends, respectively. Irish and Belgian reviewers worked the least on weekends, submitting only 6% of reviews during that time. Sixteen percent of new manuscripts were submitted on weekdays after regular office hours between 19:00pm and 07:00 am with the highest rate of nighttime submissions by Japanese (30%), Mexican (26%) and Brazilian (22%) scientists. Finnish, South African and Swiss researchers, however, submitted only 9%, 10%, and 10% of new manuscripts after regular working hours. In general, our results suggest that conservation biologists work extensively on weekends and at night, that the trend for working on weekends is increasing over time, and that these patterns have strong geographical structure. These habits could have negative impacts on the quality of the work as well as on the life-work balance of conservation scientists. Universities and other scientific organizations should allocate more time during regular work hours for scientists to complete their research duties, including the submission and review of manuscripts.
机译:这位杰出的科学家非常勤奋和反社会,他会花无数个晚上和周末在她的显微镜和手稿下埋葬。为了打破这个流行的神话,我们使用来自生物保护在线手稿提交系统的数据分析了保护生物学家的工作习惯,该系统包括2004年至2012年之间提交的10,000多手稿和近15,000条评论。我们发现,其中11%新手稿和手稿评论的12%在周末提交。在研究期间,新手稿和评论的周末提交率每年分别增长5%和6%。与其他地方的同事相比,中国和印度的生物学家在周末工作最多,在周六和周日提交论文的比例为19%。另一方面,比利时人和挪威人在周末只提交了4%的手稿。捷克和波兰的生物学家是最刻苦的周末评论者,周末分别提交了27%和25%的评论。爱尔兰和比利时的评论者在周末工作最少,在此期间仅提交了6%的评论。 16%的新手稿是在每天晚上19:00至07:00的正常办公时间后的工作日提交的,其中日本(30%),墨西哥(26%)和巴西(22%)的科学家夜间提交率最高。但是,芬兰,南非和瑞士的研究人员在正常工作时间后仅提交了9%,10%和10%的新手稿。一般而言,我们的结果表明,保护生物学家在周末和晚上广泛工作,周末工作的趋势随着时间的推移而增加,并且这些模式具有强大的地理结构。这些习惯可能对工作质量以及保护科学家的生活工作平衡产生负面影响。大学和其他科学组织应在正常工作时间分配更多时间给科学家,以完成他们的研究职责,包括提交和审阅手稿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号