...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil & Tillage Research >Is tillage an effective method to decrease phosphorus loss from phosphorus enriched pastoral soils?
【24h】

Is tillage an effective method to decrease phosphorus loss from phosphorus enriched pastoral soils?

机译:耕作是减少富磷牧草土壤中磷流失的有效方法吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The enrichment of soil phosphorus (P) can increase the potential for P loss via surface run-off and subsurface flow and impair surface water quality via eutrophication. The potential for P loss via surface runoff can be decreased by adding less P fertiliser and redistributing P within the plough layer through tillage. We tested the hypothesis that tillage would also decrease subsurface losses by disrupting preferential flow pathways and increasing P sorption as water moves via matrix flow. A 455-day lysimeter trial, carried out between February 2011 and May 2012 investigated subsurface P losses from four contrasting New Zealand soils (USDA soil taxonomy: Udand; Dystrudept; Fragiochrept and Vitrand) where P fertilisers were withheld and pasture was established following conventional tillage (to 20 cm) or conservation tillage (of the top 2 cm of soil-termed 'direct drilled'). Our main objective was to assess the effectiveness of implementing conventional tillage methods during a farm regrassing program as a method to decrease P loss via subsurface flow from pasture soils. In the tilled and direct drilled treatments, Olsen P, water extractable P and calcium chloride extractable P concentrations decreased by 5-59% over the length of the trial in the top 0-75 mm. The tilled soils showed a larger decrease in soil P concentrations than the direct drilled soils, but this was not consistent across all soil types. One month after tillage, the dissolved reactive P load in subsurface flow of three of the four soil types was 30-70% less than the direct drilled treatment, but thereafter no effect was noted. Moreover, a 4-15 fold increase in nitrate leaching across all soil types for the first month after tillage. Our study suggested that tillage was not an effective method in the long-term to decrease subsurface P losses (in contrast to surface run-off) and may increase nitrate leaching in the short term.
机译:土壤磷(P)的富集可通过地表径流和地下流量增加磷流失的可能性,并通过富营养化损害地表水质量。通过添加较少量的磷肥并通过耕作在耕种层中重新分配磷,可以减少由于地表径流造成的磷损失的可能性。我们测试了以下假设:当水通过基质流移动时,耕作还将通过中断优先流动路径并增加P吸收来减少地下损失。在2011年2月至2012年5月之间进行了455天的溶渗仪试验,调查了四种对比的新西兰土壤(USDA土壤分类法:Udand; Dystrudept; Fragiochrept和Vitrand)的地下P损失,在这些土壤中,常规耕作后保留了P肥料并建立了牧场(至20厘米)或保护性耕作(最高2厘米的土壤称为“直接钻孔”)。我们的主要目标是评估在农场放牧计划中实施传统耕作方法的有效性,以此作为通过降低牧场土壤地下流磷损失的方法。在耕作和直接钻探处理中,在试验过程中,顶部0-75 mm,Olsen P,水可萃取P和氯化钙可萃取P的浓度降低了5-59%。耕作土壤的磷含量下降幅度要比直接钻探的土壤大,但并非在所有土壤类型中都一致。耕种一个月后,四种土壤类型中的三种土壤的地下流中溶解的反应性P负荷比直接钻井处理低30-70%,但此后没有发现任何影响。此外,耕种后第一个月,所有土壤中硝酸盐的淋失增加了4-15倍。我们的研究表明,从长期看,耕作不是减少地下磷损失的有效方法(与地表径流相反),短期内可能增加硝酸盐的淋失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号