首页> 外文期刊>Soil & Tillage Research >The effects of conservation tillage practices on the soil water-holding capacity of a non-irrigated apple orchard in the Loess Plateau, China.
【24h】

The effects of conservation tillage practices on the soil water-holding capacity of a non-irrigated apple orchard in the Loess Plateau, China.

机译:黄土高原非灌溉苹果园保护性耕作方式对土壤持水量的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Six tillage practices were studied in an apple orchard located in the Loess Plateau from 2007 to 2009. The objective was to investigate the effects of tillage practices on the soil water-holding capacity in a non-irrigated orchard in China. The results showed that different tillage practices had varied effects on the water-holding properties. Subsoil tillage with straw mulching, plow tillage with straw mulching and no tillage with straw mulching showed a decrease in the soil bulk density and an increase in the soil porosity, soil saturated water content and soil moisture relative to plow tillage in bare soil (i.e., conventional tillage). Among these three tillage practices, the subsoil tillage with straw mulching and no tillage with straw mulching treatments had a significant effect on the soil porosity, soil saturated water content and soil moisture compared to the plow tillage with straw mulching treatment. These results indicate that the subsoil tillage with straw mulching, plow tillage with mulching and no tillage with mulching treatments improved the soil structure and water-holding capacity of the apple orchard. However, the no tillage with bare soil and no tillage with grass treatments increased the soil bulk density and decreased the soil porosity and soil moisture content compared to conventional tillage. This finding demonstrates that no tillage with bare soil and no tillage with grass had adverse effects on the soil structure and water-holding capacity. From the results of this study, we concluded that the subsoil tillage with straw mulching treatment is the optimum practice of the six studied treatments for improving the soil water-holding capacity in this non-irrigated apple orchard in the Loess Plateau of China.
机译:2007年至2009年,在黄土高原的苹果园研究了6种耕作方法。目的是研究耕作方法对中国非灌溉果园土壤持水量的影响。结果表明,不同耕作方式对持水性能的影响不同。相对于裸土耕作,秸秆覆盖下的耕作耕作,秸秆覆盖耕作耕作和无秸秆耕作耕作表明,与松土耕作相比,土壤容重降低,土壤孔隙度,土壤饱和水含量和土壤水分增加(即,传统耕作)。在这三种耕作方式中,与秸秆覆盖耕作耕作相比,秸秆覆盖耕作地下耕作和秸秆覆盖耕作不耕作对土壤孔隙度,土壤饱和水含量和土壤水分有显着影响。这些结果表明,秸秆覆盖地表耕作,覆盖地耕和不覆盖地耕均改善了苹果园的土壤结构和保水能力。然而,与常规耕作相比,裸土免耕和草法免耕增加了土壤容重,降低了土壤孔隙度和土壤水分。这一发现表明,没有裸土耕作和没有草耕作对土壤结构和持水量都有不利影响。根据研究结果,我们得出结论,秸秆覆盖地表耕作是提高黄土高原非灌溉苹果园土壤持水能力的六个研究方法的最佳实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号