...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil & Tillage Research >Applications of reduced tillage in hills of central Nepal.
【24h】

Applications of reduced tillage in hills of central Nepal.

机译:减少耕作在尼泊尔中部山区的应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Conventional tillage practices on steep and fragile landscape of Himalayan hills result in significant loss of topsoil during rainy season. Soil erosion in Nepal mid-hills is the most critical during pre-monsoon season. Many reviews argue that reduced tillage could be an option to tackle this problem. However, very few field experiments to evaluate reduced tillage systems have to date been conducted in this region. Thus, a field experiment was initiated in factorial randomized complete block design on acidic sandy loam soil (Lithic Dystochrept) during the summer season of 2001 at Kathmandu University (1500 masl) to assess the effects of tillage and cropping patterns on soil and nutrient losses, crop yield and soil fertility. Two main treatments viz. conventional and reduced till, and two sub-treatments viz. sole maize (Zea mays) and maize+soybean (Glycine max) were considered. Soil organic carbon (OC), total nitrogen (N), plant available phosphorus (P) and exchangeable potassium (K) were determined for the original soil and eroded sediment using standard methods. Two years of data indicated annual soil and nutrient losses to be significantly lowered by reduced till as compared to conventional till. Total annual soil loss from conventional and reduced till was 16.6 and 11.1 Mg/ha, respectively. Similarly, annual nutrient losses associated with the eroded sediment were 188 kg OC/ha, 18.8 kg N/ha, 1 kg P/ha and 3.8 kg K/ha for conventional till and 126 kg OC/ha, 11.8 kg N/ha, 1 kg P/ha and 2.4 kg K/ha for reduced till. Soil OC and N losses were significantly higher in conventional till and this may be one of the major causes of fertility depletion in the Nepalese hills. Soil chemical properties did not differ due to tillage and cropping systems; however, over years pH, N and P were increased irrespective of treatments. Although treatments were at par for maize grain yield, conventional till+soybean produced highest grain yield (4.0 Mg/ha) followed by reduced till+soybean (3.9 Mg/ha) and conventional till sole maize (3.8 Mg/ha). Mixed cropping of legumes and maize do not help conserve soil and nutrient loss in hills of central Nepal. Thus, reduced till could be a viable option for minimizing soil and nutrient losses without sacrificing economic yields in central hills of Nepal..
机译:在喜马拉雅丘陵的陡峭而脆弱的土地上,传统的耕作方式在雨季导致表土大量流失。在季风前季节,尼泊尔中山地的土壤侵蚀最为严重。许多评论认为减少耕种可能是解决这个问题的一种选择。但是,迄今为止,在该地区几乎没有进行评估减耕系统的野外试验。因此,在2001年夏季,加德满都大学(1500 masl)对酸性砂壤土(Lithic Dystochrept)进行了因子随机完整块设计的田间试验,以评估耕作和耕作方式对土壤和养分流失的影响,作物产量和土壤肥力。两种主要治疗方法。常规和精耕细作,还有两个子处理。考虑单独使用玉米(Zea mays)和玉米+大豆(Glycine max)。使用标准方法确定了原始土壤和侵蚀沉积物的土壤有机碳(OC),总氮(N),植物有效磷(P)和可交换钾(K)。两年的数据表明,与常规耕作相比,减少耕作可显着降低年度土壤和养分流失。从常规耕作到减少耕作的年土壤总损失分别为16.6 Mg / ha和11.1 Mg / ha。同样,与侵蚀性沉积物相关的年度养分损失为:常规耕作为188 kg OC / ha,18.8 kg N / ha,<1 kg P / ha和3.8 kg K / ha,常规耕作为126 kg OC / ha,11.8 kg N / ha ,<1 kg P / ha和2.4 kg K / ha进行减耕。在常规耕作之前,土壤OC和N的损失明显较高,这可能是尼泊尔丘陵地区肥力枯竭的主要原因之一。由于耕作和耕作制度,土壤化学性质没有差异。然而,随着时间的推移,无论处理如何,pH,N和P均增加。尽管对玉米籽粒产量的处理相当,但传统的直到+大豆的产量最高(4.0 Mg / ha),其次是直到+大豆的减产(3.9 Mg / ha)和常规直到唯一的玉米(3.8 Mg / ha)。混合种植豆类和玉米无助于保护尼泊尔中部丘陵地区的土壤和养分流失。因此,减少耕作可能是减少土壤和养分流失而又不影响尼泊尔中部丘陵地区经济产量的可行选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号