...
首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >A response to Bates, Hankivsky and Springer on the WHO Knowledge Network on Women and Gender Equity Commission on Social Determinants of Health.
【24h】

A response to Bates, Hankivsky and Springer on the WHO Knowledge Network on Women and Gender Equity Commission on Social Determinants of Health.

机译:在世界卫生组织关于健康的社会决定因素的妇女与性别平等委员会知识网络上对贝茨,汉基夫斯基和施普林格的回应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We are writing as co-coordinators of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health's (CSDH) Knowledge Network on Women and Gender Equity whose task was to produce a synthetic report (referred to near the end of the commentary) based on a set of commissioned background papers and detailed discussion and feedback among the members of the Network. We too, like Bates (2009), would have loved to see the Final Report of the CSDH (CSDH, 2008a) deal with intersectionality, masculinity and a critique of gender mainstreaming, since all these were discussed in great depth in our own report (Sen, Ostlin, & George, 2007).
机译:我们是作为健康问题社会决定因素委员会(CSDH)妇女与性别平等知识网络的协调员而撰写的,其任务是根据一系列委托背景撰写一份综合报告(在评论末尾提到)。文件,以及网络成员之间的详细讨论和反馈。就像贝茨(2009)一样,我们也很希望看到CSDH的最终报告(CSDH,2008a)处理交叉性,阳刚之气和对性别主流化的批评,因为在我们自己的报告中对所有这些进行了深入的讨论( Sen,Ostlin和George,2007年)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号