首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Protecting the public or setting the bar too high? Understanding the causes and consequences of regulatory actions of front-line regulators and specialized drug shop operators in Kenya
【24h】

Protecting the public or setting the bar too high? Understanding the causes and consequences of regulatory actions of front-line regulators and specialized drug shop operators in Kenya

机译:保护公众或将标准设置得过高?了解肯尼亚的前线监管者和专门的药店经营者采取监管行动的原因和后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The problem of poor regulatory compliance has been widely reported across private health providers in developing countries. Less known are the underlying reasons for poor compliance, especially with regards to the roles played by front-line regulatory staff, and the regulatory institution as a whole. We designed a qualitative study to address this gap, with the study questions and tools drawing on a conceptual framework informed by theoretical literature on regulation. Data were collected from specialized drug shops (SDSs) in two rural districts in Western Kenya in 2011 through eight focus group discussions, and from regulatory staff from organizations governing the pharmaceutical sector through a total of 24 in-depth interviews.We found that relationships between front-line regulators and SDS operators were a strong influence on regulatory behaviour, often resulting in non-compliance and perverse outcomes such as corruption. It emerged that separate regulatory streams operated in urban and rural locations, based mainly on differing relationships between the front-line regulators and SDS operators, and on broader factors such as the competition environment and community expectations. Effective incentive structures for regulatory staff were either absent, or poorly linked to performance in regulatory organizations, resulting in divergences between the purposes of the regulatory organization and activities of front-line staff.Given the rural-urban differences in the practice environment, the introduction of lower retail practice requirements for rural SDSs could be considered. This would allow illegally operated shops to be brought within the regulatory framework, facilitating good quality provision of essential commodities to marginalized areas, without lowering the practice requirements for the better complying urban SDSs. In addition, regulatory organizations need to devise incentives that better link the level of effort to rewards such as professional advancement of regulatory staff.
机译:发展中国家的私人卫生保健提供者广泛报道了监管合规性差的问题。法规遵从性差的根本原因鲜为人知,尤其是在一线监管人员和整个监管机构所扮演的角色方面。我们设计了定性研究来解决这一差距,研究问题和工具借鉴了有关监管理论文献的概念框架。数据是通过2011年在肯尼亚西部两个农村地区的专科药房(SDS)进行的八次焦点小组讨论收集的,数据来自治理制药行业的组织的监管人员,共进行了24次深度访谈。一线监管者和SDS运营商对监管行为产生了重大影响,通常会导致违规和腐败等不良后果。结果表明,主要基于一线监管者与SDS运营商之间的不同关系,以及竞争环境和社区期望等更广泛的因素,在城市和农村地区运营着不同的监管部门。由于缺乏有效的监管人员激励机制,或与监管机构绩效之间的联系不紧密,导致监管机构的宗旨与一线员工活动之间存在差异。可以考虑降低农村SDS的零售实践要求。这将使非法经营的商店被纳入监管框架之内,从而有利于向边缘化地区提供优质的基本商品,而又不会降低对更好地遵守城市SDS的实践要求。此外,监管组织需要制定激励措施,以更好地将工作水平与奖励挂钩,例如监管人员的专业晋升。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号