首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Bringing politics and evidence together: Policy entrepreneurship and the conception of the At Home/Chez Soi Housing First Initiative for addressing homelessness and mental illness in Canada
【24h】

Bringing politics and evidence together: Policy entrepreneurship and the conception of the At Home/Chez Soi Housing First Initiative for addressing homelessness and mental illness in Canada

机译:汇集政治和证据:政策企业家精神和“在家/ Ches Soi住房优先计划”的构想,旨在解决加拿大的无家可归和精神疾病

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An interesting question concerns how large-scale (mental) health services policy initiatives come into being, and the role of evidence within the decision-making process behind their origins. This paper illustrates the process by which motivation to address homelessness, in the context of the upcoming 2010 Vancouver Olympics, was leveraged into a pan-Canadian project including sites in Vancouver, Winnipeg, Toronto, Montreal and Moncton, New Brunswick. The aim of the initiative was to implement and evaluate an intervention, Housing First, to provide housing and support to previously homeless people with mental illness. This qualitative case study was conducted between December 2009 and December 2010, employing grounded theory, and drawing on archival documents and interviews with 19 key informants involved in the conception of the project. Overall, the findings affirm that policy-making does not follow a rational, linear process of knowledge translation/exchange (KTE) and implementation, whereby evidence-based " products" are brought forward to address objectively determined needs and then " placed into decision-making events" (. Lomas, 2007, p. 130). Instead, evidence-based policy making should be understood within the much more complex context of " policy entrepreneurship" (. Kingdon, 2003; Mintrom & Norman, 2009) which entails taking advantage of windows of opportunity, and helping to bring together the " streams" of problems, politics, and policy ideas (. Kingdon, 2003).
机译:一个有趣的问题涉及大规模(精神)卫生服务政策倡议如何形成,以及证据在其起源背后的决策过程中的作用。本文说明了在即将到来的2010年温哥华奥运会背景下解决无家可归的动机的过程,该过程被运用到一个泛加拿大项目中,其中包括在温哥华,温尼伯,多伦多,蒙特利尔和蒙克顿,新不伦瑞克的站点。该计划的目的是实施和评估一项名为“住房优先”的干预措施,以便为以前无家可归的精神疾病患者提供住房和支持。该定性案例研究在2009年12月至2010年12月之间进行,运用了扎根的理论,并利用档案文件和对参与该项目概念的19位主要信息提供者的采访。总体而言,调查结果肯定了决策过程并未遵循知识转化/交换(KTE)和实施过程的合理,线性过程,因此提出了基于证据的“产品”来满足客观确定的需求,然后将其“置于决策中”。制作事件”(洛马斯,2007年,第130页)。取而代之的是,应该在更为复杂的“政策企业家精神”(。Kingdon,2003; Mintrom&Norman,2009)的背景下理解基于证据的政策制定,这需要抓住机会之窗,并帮助汇集“机会之流”。问题,政治和政策构想”(金登,2003年)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号