首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Does an immigrant health paradox exist among Asian Americans? Associations of nativity and occupational class with self-rated health and mental disorders
【24h】

Does an immigrant health paradox exist among Asian Americans? Associations of nativity and occupational class with self-rated health and mental disorders

机译:亚裔美国人中是否存在移民健康悖论?耶稣诞生和职业阶层与自我评估的健康和精神障碍的关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A robust socioeconomic gradient in health is well-documented, with higher socioeconomic status (SES) associated with better health across the SES spectrum. However, recent studies of U.S. racial/ethnic minorities and immigrants show complex SES-health patterns (e.g., flat gradients), with individuals of low SES having similar or better health than their richer, U.S.-born and more acculturated counterparts, a so-called " epidemiological paradox" or " immigrant health paradox" To examine whether this exists among Asian Americans, we investigate how nativity and occupational class (white-collar, blue-collar, service, unemployed) are associated with subjective health (self-rated physical health, self-rated mental health) and 12-month DSM-IV mental disorders (any mental disorder, anxiety, depression). We analyzed data from 1530 Asian respondents to the 2002-2003 National Latino and Asian American Study in the labor force using hierarchical multivariate logistic regression models controlling for confounders, subjective social status (SSS), material and psychosocial factors theorized to explain health inequalities. Compared to U.S.-born Asians, immigrants had worse socioeconomic profiles, and controlling for age and gender, increased odds for reporting fair/poor mental health and decreased odds for any DSM-IV mental disorder and anxiety. No strong occupational class-health gradients were found. The foreign-born health-protective effect persisted after controlling for SSS but became nonsignificant after controlling for material and psychosocial factors. Speaking fair/poor English was strongly associated with all outcomes. Material and psychosocial factors were associated with some outcomes - perceived financial need with subjective health, uninsurance with self-rated mental health and depression, social support, discrimination and acculturative stress with all or most DSM-IV outcomes. Our findings caution against using terms like " immigrant health paradox" which oversimplify complex patterns and mask negative outcomes among underserved sub-groups (e.g., speaking fair/poor English, experiencing acculturative stress). We discuss implications for better measurement of SES and health given the absence of a gradient and seemingly contradictory finding of nativity-related differences in self-rated health and DSM-IV mental disorders.
机译:健全的健康社会经济梯度已得到充分证明,更高的社会经济地位(SES)与整个SES范围内的更好健康相关。但是,最近对美国种族/族裔少数群体和移民的研究表明,复杂的SES健康模式(例如,平坦的梯度),SES低的个体的健康状况与其较富有的,在美国出生且文化程度较高的同龄人相似或更好。称为“流行病学悖论”或“移民健康悖论”为了研究亚裔美国人中是否存在这种现象,我们调查了出生率和职业(白领,蓝领,服务,失业)与主观健康(自测身体状况)之间的关系。健康,自我评估的精神健康)和12个月的DSM-IV精神障碍(任何精神障碍,焦虑症,抑郁症)。我们使用分层多元logistic回归模型分析了来自1530名2002-2003年全国拉美裔和亚裔美国人研究的亚裔劳动力的数据,这些模型控制混杂因素,主观社会地位(SSS),理论上可以解释健康不平等现象的物质和心理社会因素。与美国出生的亚洲人相比,移民的社会经济状况较差,并且控制了年龄和性别,报告了公平/较差的心理健康的几率增加,而任何DSM-IV精神障碍和焦虑的几率降低。没有发现强烈的职业类别健康梯度。控制SSS后,外国出生的健康保护作用持续存在,但在控制物质和社会心理因素后,这种保护作用变得不显着。讲英语的公平/较差与所有结果密切相关。物质和社会心理因素与某些结果相关-主观健康的财务需求,自我评估的精神健康和抑郁的保险,社会支持,歧视和适应压力与所有或大多数DSM-IV结果有关。我们的研究结果告诫不要使用诸如“移民健康悖论”之类的术语,这些术语过分简化了复杂的模式并掩盖了服务不足的亚人群中的不良后果(例如,说普通话/英语较差,承受着适应性压力)。我们讨论了更好的SES和健康测量的含义,因为在自我评估的健康状况和DSM-IV精神障碍中没有与出生率相关的差异,而且看似矛盾的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号