首页> 外文期刊>Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology >The co-occurrence of PTSD and dissociation: Differentiating severe PTSD from dissociative-PTSD
【24h】

The co-occurrence of PTSD and dissociation: Differentiating severe PTSD from dissociative-PTSD

机译:PTSD与解离的共存:区分严重PTSD与解离性PTSD

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: A dissociative-posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) subtype has been included in the DSM-5. However, it is not yet clear whether certain socio-demographic characteristics or psychological/clinical constructs such as comorbid psychopathology differentiate between severe PTSD and dissociative-PTSD. The current study investigated the existence of a dissociative-PTSD subtype and explored whether a number of trauma and clinical covariates could differentiate between severe PTSD alone and dissociative-PTSD. Methods: The current study utilized a sample of 432 treatment seeking Canadian military veterans. Participants were assessed with the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and self-report measures of traumatic life events, depression, and anxiety. CAPS severity scores were created reflecting the sum of the frequency and intensity items from each of the 17 PTSD and 3 dissociation items. The CAPS severity scores were used as indicators in a latent profile analysis (LPA) to investigate the existence of a dissociative-PTSD subtype. Subsequently, several covariates were added to the model to explore differences between severe PTSD alone and dissociative-PTSD. Results: The LPA identified five classes: one of which constituted a severe PTSD group (30.5 %), and one of which constituted a dissociative-PTSD group (13.7 %). None of the included, demographic, trauma, or clinical covariates were significantly predictive of membership in the dissociative-PTSD group compared to the severe PTSD group. Conclusions: In conclusion, a significant proportion of individuals report high levels of dissociation alongside their PTSD, which constitutes a dissociative-PTSD subtype. Further investigation is needed to identify which factors may increase or decrease the likelihood of membership in a dissociative-PTSD subtype group compared to a severe PTSD only group.
机译:目的:DSM-5中包含了创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)亚型。但是,尚不清楚某些社会人口统计学特征或心理/临床构造(例如共病的心理病理学)是否可以区分严重的PTSD和分离的PTSD。当前的研究调查了分离性PTSD亚型的存在,并探讨了许多创伤和临床协变量是否可以区分单独的严重PTSD和分离性PTSD。方法:目前的研究使用了432例寻求加拿大军方退伍军人治疗的样本。使用临床医生管理的PTSD量表(CAPS)和创伤生活事件,抑郁和焦虑的自我报告方法对参与者进行评估。创建CAPS严重程度评分,以反映来自17个PTSD和3个解离项目中每个项目的频率和强度项目的总和。 CAPS严重性评分在潜在特征分析(LPA)中用作指标,以研究解离性PTSD亚型的存在。随后,将几个协变量添加到模型中,以探讨单独的严重PTSD与解离性PTSD之间的差异。结果:LPA确定了五类:其中一类构成严重的PTSD组(30.5%),其中一类构成解离性PTSD组(13.7%)。与严重的PTSD组相比,所包括的,人口统计学的,创伤的或临床的协变量均不能显着预测分离型PTSD组的成员。结论:总之,很大一部分人与PTSD一起报告了高水平的解离,这构成了解离性PTSD亚型。与仅严重PTSD的组相比,需要进一步的研究来确定哪些因素可能增加或减少离解性PTSD亚型组成员的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号