首页> 外文期刊>Silva Fennica >Reliability of the predicted stand structure for clear-cut stands using optional methods: airborne laser scanning-based methods, smartphone-based forest inventory application Trestima and pre-harvest measurement tool EMO
【24h】

Reliability of the predicted stand structure for clear-cut stands using optional methods: airborne laser scanning-based methods, smartphone-based forest inventory application Trestima and pre-harvest measurement tool EMO

机译:使用可选方法的清晰林的预测林结构的可靠性:基于机载激光扫描的方法,基于智能手机的森林清查应用程序Trestima和收获前测量工具EMO

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accurate timber assortment information is required before cuttings to optimize wood allocation and logging activities. Timber assortments can be derived from diameter-height distribution that is most often predicted from the stand characteristics provided by forest inventory. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the accuracy of three different pre-harvest inventory methods in predicting the structure of mainly Scots pine-dominated, clear-cut stands. The investigated methods were an area-based approach (ABA) based on airborne laser scanning data, the smartphone-based forest inventory Trestima app and the more conventional pre-harvest inventory method called EMO. The estimates of diameter-height distributions based on each method were compared to accurate tree taper data measured and registered by the harvester's measurement systems during the final cut. According to our results, grid-level ABA and Trestima were generally the most accurate methods for predicting diameter-height distribution. ABA provides predictions for systematic 16 m x 16 m grids from which stand-wise characteristics are aggregated. In order to enable multimodal stand-wise distributions, distributions must be predicted for each grid cell and then aggregated for the stand level, instead of predicting a distribution from the aggregated stand-level characteristics. Trestima required a sufficient sample for reliable results. EMO provided accurate results for the dominating Scots pine but, it could not capture minor admixtures. ABA seemed rather trustworthy in predicting stand characteristics and diameter distribution of standing trees prior to harvesting. Therefore, if up-to-date ABA information is available, only limited benefits can be obtained from stand-specific inventory using Trestima or EMO in mature pine or spruce-dominated forests.
机译:伐木前需要准确的木材分类信息,以优化木材分配和伐木活动。木材的种类可以从直径-高度分布中得出,而直径-高度分布通常是由森林资源提供的林分特征预测的。这项研究的目的是评估和比较三种不同的收获前清点方法在预测以苏格兰松树为主的明确林分结构方面的准确性。研究的方法是基于机载激光扫描数据的基于区域的方法(ABA),基于智能手机的森林清查Trestima应用程序和更传统的收获前清查方法,称为EMO。将基于每种方法的直径高度分布的估计值与准确的树木锥度数据进行比较,这些数据由收割机的测量系统在最终切割期间进行测量和记录。根据我们的结果,网格级别的ABA和Trestima通常是预测直径高度分布的最准确方法。 ABA提供了系统的16 m x 16 m网格的预测,这些网格可以汇总静态特征。为了实现多模式立式分布,必须针对每个网格单元预测分布,然后针对立架级别进行汇总,而不是根据聚合的立架特性来预测分布。 Trestima需要足够的样本才能得出可靠的结果。 EMO为占主导地位的苏格兰松树提供了准确的结果,但无法捕获少量的外加剂。 ABA在收获前预测林分特征和立木直径分布方面似乎值得信赖。因此,如果可获得最新的ABA信息,则在成熟的松树或以云杉为主的森林中使用Trestima或EMO只能从特定的林分清单中获得有限的收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号