首页> 外文期刊>Silva Fennica >Parameter recovery vs. parameter prediction for the Weibull distribution validated for Scots pine stands in Finland.
【24h】

Parameter recovery vs. parameter prediction for the Weibull distribution validated for Scots pine stands in Finland.

机译:Weibull分布的参数恢复与参数预测对比已针对芬兰的苏格兰松树林进行了验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The moment-based parameter recovery method (PRM) has not been applied in Finland since the 1930s, even after a continuation of forest stand structure modelling in the 1980s. This paper presents a general overview of PRM and some useful applications. Applied PRM provided compatibility for the included stand characteristics of stem number (N) and basal area (G) with either mean (D), basal area-weighted mean (DG), median (DM) or basal area-median (DGM) diameter at breast height (dbh). A two-parameter Weibull function was used to describe the dbh-frequency distribution of Scots pine stands in Finland. In the validation, PRM was compared with existing parameter prediction models (PPMs). In addition, existing models for stand characteristics were used for the prediction of unknown characteristics. Validation consisted of examining the performance of the predicted distributions with respect to variation in stand density and accuracy of the localised distributions, as well as accuracy in terms of bias and the RMSE in stand characteristics in the independent test data set. The validation data consisted of 467 randomly selected stands from the National Forest Inventory based plots. PRM demonstrated excellent accuracy if G and N were both known. At its best, PRM provided accuracy that was superior to any existing model in Finland - especially in young stands (mean height <9 m), where the RMSE in total and pulp wood volumes, 3.6 and 5.7%, respectively, was reduced by one-half of the values obtained using the best performing existing PPM (8.7-11.3%). The unweighted Weibull distribution solved by PRM was found to be competitive with weighted existing PPMs for advanced stands. Therefore, using PRM, the need for a basal area weighted distribution proved unnecessary, contrary to common belief. Models for G and N were shown to be unreliable and need to be improved to obtain more reliable distributions using PRM.
机译:自1930年代以来,即使在1980年代继续进行林分结构建模之后,基于矩的参数恢复方法(PRM)仍未在芬兰应用。本文概述了PRM及其一些有用的应用程序。应用的PRM为包括的茎数(N)和基部面积(G)的均分(D),基部面积加权平均值(DG),中位数(DM)或基部面积中位数(DGM)直径提供了兼容性在乳房的高度(dbh)。使用两参数威布尔函数来描述芬兰的苏格兰松树林的dbh-频率分布。在验证中,将PRM与现有的参数预测模型(PPM)进行了比较。此外,现有的林分特征模型用于未知特征的预测。验证包括检查预测分布在林分密度变化和局部分布准确性方面的性能,以及独立测试数据集中在林分特性方面的偏差和RMSE方面的准确性。验证数据包括从基于国家森林清单的地块中随机选择的467个林分。如果G和N都已知,则PRM表现出极好的准确性。在最佳状态下,PRM所提供的精度要优于芬兰任何现有模型-尤其是在幼林看台(平均高度<9 m)中,在该模型中,RMSE的总体积和纸浆体积分别降低了3.6和5.7%使用最佳性能的现有PPM获得的值的一半(8.7-11.3%)。通过PRM解决的未加权Weibull分布与先进展台的加权现有PPM相比具有竞争力。因此,与普遍的看法相反,使用PRM证明不需要基础区域加权分布。 G和N的模型显示不可靠,需要进行改进以使用PRM获得更可靠的分布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号