首页> 外文期刊>Silva Fennica >Energy Wood Thinning as a Part of the Stand Management of Scots Pine and Norway Spruce
【24h】

Energy Wood Thinning as a Part of the Stand Management of Scots Pine and Norway Spruce

机译:能源木材间伐作为苏格兰松树和挪威云杉林分管理的一部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The effects of combined production of industrial and energy wood on yield and harvesting incomes, as well as the feasibility of energy wood procurement, were studied. Data for 22 Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and 21 Norway spruce (Picea abies (L) Karst) juvenile stands in Central and Southern Finland were used to compare six combined production regimes to conventional industrial wood production. The study was based on simulations made by the MOTTI stand simulator, which produces growth predictions for alternative management regimes under various site and climatic conditions. The combined production regimes included precommercial thinning at 4-8 in dominant height to a density of 3000-4000 steins ha(-1) and energy wood harvesting at 8, 10 or 12 m dominant height. Combined production did not decrease the total Yield Of industrial wood during the rotation period. Differences in the mean annual increment (MAI) were small, and the rotation periods varied only slightly between the alternatives. Combined production regime can he feasible for a forest owner if the price of energy wood is 3-5 is an element of m(-3) in pine stands, and 8 9 F, M 3 in spruce stands. Energy wood procurement was not economically viable at the Current energy price (12 is an element of MWh(-1)) without state subsidies. Without subsidies a 15 is an element of MWh(-1) energy price would be needed. Our results imply that the combined production of industrial and energy wood could be a feasible stand management alternative.
机译:研究了工业木材和能源木材的联合生产对单产和收获收入的影响,以及能源木材采购的可行性。芬兰中部和南部的22个苏格兰松树(Pinus sylvestris L.)和21个挪威云杉(Picea abies(L)Karst)幼林的数据用于比较六种联合生产方式与常规工业木材生产。这项研究基于MOTTI林分模拟机进行的模拟,该模拟可在各种工地和气候条件下为替代管理制度提供增长预测。合并的生产方式包括商业前的稀疏,优势高度为4-8,密度为3000-4000 steins ha(-1),能量木材收获为优势高度8、10或12 m。轮换期间,联合生产不会降低工业木材的总产量。平均年度增量(MAI)的差异很小,轮换期在备选方案之间仅略有变化。如果能源木材的价格为3-5,是松木林中m(-3)的要素,而云杉林中8 9 F,M 3的要素,则联合生产制度对于森林所有者而言是可行的。在没有国家补贴的情况下,按当前能源价格(12是MWh(-1)的一个元素),能源木材的采购在经济上不可行。如果没有补贴,则兆瓦时(-1)的能源价格就必须达到15。我们的结果表明,工业木材和能源木材的联合生产可能是可行的林分管理替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号