...
首页> 外文期刊>Sexually Transmitted Infections >Does palliative care improve outcomes for patients with HIV/AIDS? A systematic review of the evidence.
【24h】

Does palliative care improve outcomes for patients with HIV/AIDS? A systematic review of the evidence.

机译:姑息治疗是否可以改善HIV / AIDS患者的预后?对证据的系统审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The need for palliative care in HIV management is underlined by the high prevalence of pain and symptoms, the toxicity, side effects, and virological failure associated with antiretroviral therapy, emergence of co-morbidities, continued high incidence of malignancies, late presentation of people with HIV disease, and the comparatively higher death rates among the infected individuals. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken to appraise the effect of models of palliative care on patient outcomes. A detailed search strategy was devised and biomedical databases searched using specific terms relevant to models of palliative care. Data from papers that met the inclusion criteria were extracted into common tables, and evidence independently graded using well described hierarchy of evidence. RESULTS: 34 services met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 22 had been evaluated, and the evidence was graded as follows: grade 1 (n = 1); grade 2 (n = 2); grade 3 (n = 7); grade 4 (n = 1); qualitative (n = 6). Services were grouped as: home based care (n = 15); home palliative care/hospice at home (n = 7); hospice inpatient (n = 4); hospital inpatient palliative care (n = 4); specialist AIDS inpatient unit (n = 2); and hospital inpatient and outpatient care (n = 2). The evidence largely demonstrated that home palliative care and inpatient hospice care significantly improved patient outcomes in the domains of pain and symptom control, anxiety, insight, and spiritual wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: Although the appraisal of evidence found improvements across domains, the current body of evidence suffers from a lack of (quasi) experimental methods and standardised measures. The specialism of palliative care is responding to the clinical evidence that integration into earlier disease stages is necessary. Further studies are needed to both identify feasible methods and evaluate the apparent beneficial effect of palliative care on patient outcomes in the post-HAART era.
机译:背景:在艾滋病毒管理中需要姑息治疗的原因是疼痛和症状的高患病率,与抗逆转录病毒疗法相关的毒性,副作用和病毒学失败,合并症,恶性肿瘤的持续高发,晚期出现艾滋病毒感染者以及被感染者中较高的死亡率。方法:进行了系统评价以评估姑息治疗模型对患者预后的影响。设计了详细的搜索策略,并使用与姑息治疗模型相关的特定术语搜索生物医学数据库。将符合入选标准的论文数据提取到通用表中,并使用描述充分的证据层次结构对证据进行独立分级。结果:34项服务符合纳入标准。其中22个已经过评估,证据等级如下:1级(n = 1); 1级(n = 1)。 2年级(n = 2); 3年级(n = 7); 4年级(n = 1);定性的(n = 6)。服务分为:家庭护理(n = 15);家庭护理(n = 15)。在家中的姑息治疗/临终关怀(n = 7);临终关怀住院(n = 4);医院住院姑息治疗(n = 4);艾滋病专科住院病人(n = 2);以及医院的住院和门诊护理(n = 2)。大量证据表明,家庭姑息治疗和住院临终关怀治疗在疼痛和症状控制,焦虑,洞察力和精神健康方面显着改善了患者的预后。结论:尽管证据评估发现跨领域改进,但目前的证据缺乏(准)实验方法和标准化措施。姑息治疗的专长是对必须纳入疾病早期阶段的临床证据的回应。在HAART时代之后,需要进一步的研究来确定可行的方法并评估姑息治疗对患者预后的明显有益作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号