首页> 外文期刊>Sex roles >Are Gender Differences in Self-Reported Rumination Explained by Women's Stereotyping?
【24h】

Are Gender Differences in Self-Reported Rumination Explained by Women's Stereotyping?

机译:女性定型观念能解释自我报告的反省中的性别差异吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although Response Styles Theory posits gender differences in ruminative thought related to depression, evidence of these differences resides largely in self-report data, leading us to hypothesize that stereotyping may influence women's perceived rumination. In an online survey with 94 U. S. Midwestern college women and 74 men, the re-affirmed relationship between gender and rumination (such that women reported higher levels than men) was moderated by general stereotype acceptance and endorsement of traditional roles for women (benevolent sexism). Only for women were stereotype acceptance and benevolent sexism positively related to perceived rumination, suggesting that rumination may be reported most by women who believe it to be a gender-appropriate response and raising questions about the robustness of gender differences in actual rumination.
机译:尽管“回应风格理论”在与抑郁症有关的反刍思维中假设了性别差异,但这些差异的证据主要存在于自我报告数据中,这使我们假设陈规定型观念可能会影响女性的反省。在一项针对94位美国中西部大学女性和74位男性的在线调查中,性别与反省之间的关系得到了再次确认(例如,女性报告的水平高于男性),这是通过接受普遍的成见和对女性传统角色的认可(仁慈的性别歧视) 。仅仅对女性而言,刻板印象的接受和仁慈的性别歧视与感觉到的反刍正相关,这表明大多数认为反刍的女性认为反刍是针对性别的回应,并提出了关于实际反刍中性别差异的鲁棒性的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号