首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism >Methods of formal consensus in classification/diagnostic criteria and guideline development.
【24h】

Methods of formal consensus in classification/diagnostic criteria and guideline development.

机译:在分类/诊断标准和指南制定中正式达成共识的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Guidelines or diagnostic criteria in clinical practice assist physicians in their clinical decision-making and improve health outcomes for patients. Diagnostic and classification criteria should be based on evidence from rigorously conducted controlled studies. Formal group consensus methods have been developed to organize subjective judgments and to synthesize them with the available evidence. This review discusses 4 types of formal consensus methods used in the health field and their applications in rheumatology: the Delphi method, Nominal Group Technique, RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, and National Institutes of Health consensus development conference.
机译:临床实践中的准则或诊断标准可帮助医生做出临床决策并改善患者的健康状况。诊断和分类标准应基于严格进行的对照研究的证据。已经开发出正式的群体共识方法来组织主观判断并将其与可用证据进行综合。这篇综述讨论了在卫生领域中使用的4种形式的正式共识方法及其在风湿病学中的应用:Delphi方法,名义组技术,RAND / UCLA适当方法和美国国立卫生研究院共识发展会议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号