首页> 外文期刊>Semina: Ciencias Agrarias >Comparison of the serologic tests of indirect Immunofluorescence, rapid conglutination, indirect ELISA and competition ELISA for detection of antibodies against Anaplasma marginale in cattle sera from different enzootic areas
【24h】

Comparison of the serologic tests of indirect Immunofluorescence, rapid conglutination, indirect ELISA and competition ELISA for detection of antibodies against Anaplasma marginale in cattle sera from different enzootic areas

机译:间接免疫荧光,快速凝集,间接ELISA和竞争ELISA的血清学检测方法的比较,以检测来自不同生境地区牛血清中无缘无浆体的抗体

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Serological tests like rapid conglutination test (RCT), indirect ELISA (iELISA) and indirect immunofluorescent assay (IFA) were comparatively evaluated to detect antibodies against Anaplasma marginale. Competitive ELISA was used as the gold test during the study. A total of 453 sera from vaccinated and unvaccinated cattle collected from enzootic stable and unstable areas were tested. iELISA, IFA and RCT presented 0.77 (substantial), 0.57 and 0.49 (moderate) kappa index; 90.6, 90.2 and 73.7% sensitivity; and 86.6, 62.8 and 79.3% specificity, respectively. Results showed that iELISA presented better specificity than IFA and RCT, and can be indicated for more detailed serological investigations, detection of persistently infected animals in cattle herds and for monitoring of vaccination programmes. IFA and RCT can be used in prevalence studies and to monitor cattle movement between different geographical regions..
机译:比较评估了血清学检测,如快速凝集试验(RCT),间接ELISA(iELISA)和间接免疫荧光测定(IFA),以检测抗边缘无浆膜的抗体。在研究过程中,竞争性ELISA被用作金测试。测试了从稳定和不稳定的地方采集的总计453份疫苗接种和未接种牛的血清。 iELISA,IFA和RCT的kappa指数分别为0.77、0.57和0.49(中度)。灵敏度为90.6、90.2和73.7%;特异性分别为86.6、62.8和79.3%。结果表明,iELISA具有比IFA和RCT更好的特异性,可用于更详细的血清学研究,牛群中持续感染动物的检测以及疫苗接种计划的监测。 IFA和RCT可用于流行率研究,并监测不同地理区域之间的牛只活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号