...
首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature
【24h】

Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature

机译:非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术与常规冠状动脉搭桥术:文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The recent development of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) graft surgical techniques has led to numerous observational and several randomized trials that have investigated outcomes compared with the current gold standard of conventional on-pump coronary bypass (CCAB) graft surgery. This systematic review assesses the current randomized trials that compare OPCAB and CCAB. Numerous end points were investigated, including mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, blood transfusions, wound infections, and renal failure. In addition to these important outcomes, resource utilization markers were also examined such as hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and duration of intubation/ventilation. Finally, when level I evidence from randomized trials was unavailable, level II evidence was examined. This was done for subgroup analysis, where currently no randomized trials exist, looking at OPCAB in high-risk patients. Recommendations were made as to who should receive OPCAB and the potential benefits in this patient population.
机译:非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)移植手术技术的最新发展导致了许多观察性研究和一些随机试验,与常规的常规体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(CCAB)移植术的金标准相比,该研究对结果进行了研究。该系统评价评估了比较OPCAB和CCAB的当前随机试验。研究了许多终点,包括死亡率,中风,心肌梗塞,房颤,输血,伤口感染和肾衰竭。除了这些重要的结果外,还检查了资源利用标记,例如医院住院时间,重症监护病房住院时间和插管/通气时间。最后,当没有来自随机试验的I级证据时,将检查II级证据。这样做是为了进行亚组分析,目前尚无针对高危患者的OPCAB的随机试验。对于谁应该接受OPCAB以及在该患者人群中的潜在益处提出了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号