首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. >Description of pain provocation tests used for the diagnosis of sports-related chronic groin pain: relationship of tests to defined clinical (pain and tenderness) and MRI (pubic bone marrow oedema) criteria.
【24h】

Description of pain provocation tests used for the diagnosis of sports-related chronic groin pain: relationship of tests to defined clinical (pain and tenderness) and MRI (pubic bone marrow oedema) criteria.

机译:用于诊断与运动有关的慢性腹股沟疼痛的疼痛激发试验的描述:试验与确定的临床(疼痛和压痛)和MRI(耻骨骨髓水肿)标准的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The clinical assessment of groin pain in athletes is difficult, with the lack of specific clinical tests being in part responsible. Three pain provocation tests used in the diagnosis of chronic groin pain are described and their relationship to defined clinical and MRI criteria has been assessed. Eighty-nine Australian Rules football players with and without groin symptoms underwent clinical examination followed by history. Three pain provocation tests were performed (named as the Single Adductor, Squeeze and Bilateral Adductor tests). All athletes subsequently underwent MRI of their groin region for the presence of significant pubic bone marrow oedema (BMO). Of the 89, 47 were defined as having chronic groin pain, and 46 had significant BMO with 37 having both chronic groin pain and BMO. The three pain provocation tests demonstrated only moderate sensitivity (range 30-65%). Positive predictive values were moderate to high (67-93%) depending upon the individual test. The Bilateral Adductor test was themost sensitive test with the highest positive predictive values. The high specificity (88-93%) demonstrated should be treated with caution due to the study methodology. Three pain provocation tests of potential value in assessing chronic groin pain in athletes are described. If positive, all three pain provocation tests demonstrated a high likelihood for the athlete having MR-detected parasymphyseal pubic BMO. Further research is required on assessing the clinical usefulness of these tests.
机译:运动员腹股沟疼痛的临床评估很困难,缺乏具体的临床测试是部分原因。描述了用于诊断慢性腹股沟疼痛的三种疼痛激发试验,并评估了它们与确定的临床和MRI标准的关系。对89名有或没有腹股沟症状的澳大利亚规则足球运动员进行临床检查,然后进行病史检查。进行了三次疼痛激发试验(分别称为“单引物”,“挤压”和“双侧引物”测试)。随后,所有运动员因其严重耻骨骨髓水肿(BMO)的存在而对其腹股沟区域进行MRI检查。在这89个中,有47个被定义为患有慢性腹股沟疼痛,有46个具有明显的BMO,其中37个同时具有慢性腹股沟疼痛和BMO。三种疼痛激发试验显示仅中等敏感性(范围为30-65%)。阳性预测值中等至较高(67-93%),具体取决于各个测试。双侧引伸试验是最灵敏的试验,具有最高的阳性预测值。由于研究方法的原因,显示出的高特异性(88-93%)应谨慎对待。描述了三种潜在的疼痛激发试验,以评估运动员的慢性腹股沟疼痛。如果为阳性,则所有三种疼痛激发试验均表明该运动员患有MR检测到的耻骨联合耻骨旁BMO的可能性很高。在评估这些测试的临床实用性方面需要进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号