首页> 外文期刊>Scottish Journal of Geology >Discussion of ‘Late Devensian palaeoenvironmental changes in the sea area adjacent to Islay, SW Scotland: implications for the deglacial history of the island’ by J.D. Peacock, Scottish Journal of Geology, 44, 183–190
【24h】

Discussion of ‘Late Devensian palaeoenvironmental changes in the sea area adjacent to Islay, SW Scotland: implications for the deglacial history of the island’ by J.D. Peacock, Scottish Journal of Geology, 44, 183–190

机译:苏格兰地质杂志J.D. Peacock讨论的“苏格兰西南部艾莱岛附近海域的晚期德文斯古古环境变化:对岛上冰河史的影响”,第44页,第183-190页

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A.G. Dawson writes: The paper by Peacock (2008) represents a valuable contribution to our understanding of the Late Quaternary history of Islay in particular and the SW Scottish Hebrides as a whole. As part of the conclusions based on examination and dating of three cores (two from Loch Indaal and one from between SE Islay and SE Jura) Peacock argues that his interpretation is difficult to reconcile with the view presented by this author that the limit of the Late Devensian ice sheet lay SW–NE across Islay and is represented, in part, by the Central Islay moraine (Dawson 1982). The latter view is not a new one. For example, Sissons (1981) argued on several grounds (mostly on the basis of raised shoreline evidence) that the last (Late Devensian) Scottish ice sheet may have terminated amidst the Inner Hebridean islands. Of course, conventional wisdom would suggest that the limit of the last (Late Devensian) ice sheet lay far to the west of the Inner Hebrides, so why should an idea exist that this ice limit may have been located closer to the Scottish mainland? The initial discussion of this topic was presented by Dawson (1982) with new data described in several later papers (Benn & Dawson 1987; Dawson et al. 1997; Dawson & Dawson 2001). The interpretation of the regional deglacial history is based on geomorphological and stratigraphical evidence not mentioned in Peacock (2008). For purposes of clarity the key arguments are summarized below and their resolution is central to any understanding of the deglacial history of Islay and surrounding areas.
机译:A.G.道森(A.G. Dawson)写道:孔雀(Peacock,2008)的论文对我们尤其是对艾莱岛的第四纪晚期历史以及整个西南苏格兰赫布里底群岛的了解做出了宝贵的贡献。作为基于对三个核心的研究和测年的结论的一部分(两个来自Loch Indaal,一个来自SE Islay和SE Jura之间),孔雀认为,他的解释很难与作者提出的观点相吻合,即后期的极限德文斯山脉的冰盖在整个艾莱岛上埋藏SW-NE,部分地由中央艾莱冰m代表(Dawson 1982)。后一种观点不是新观点。例如,西森斯(Sissons,1981)出于多种理由(主要是基于提高的海岸线证据)辩称,最后一个(晚期德文斯时期的)苏格兰冰盖可能已经在内赫布里底群岛中止了。当然,传统观点认为,最后一个(晚期德文斯主义)冰盖的边界位于内赫布里底山脉以西,因此为什么要有一个想法认为该冰盖可能位于更靠近苏格兰大陆的地方呢? Dawson(1982)提出了这个话题的最初讨论,随后的几篇论文中也描述了新的数据(Benn&Dawson 1987; Dawson et al。1997; Dawson&Dawson 2001)。对区域冰河史的解释是基于孔雀(2008)中未提及的地貌和地层证据。为了清楚起见,下面总结了主要论点,其解决方案对于理解艾莱岛及其周边地区的冰河史至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号