首页> 外文期刊>Scientifur >Evidence for genetic variation in bite marks in group housed mink
【24h】

Evidence for genetic variation in bite marks in group housed mink

机译:集体饲养的水貂咬痕遗传变异的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is evidence from several species (e.g. poultry) that selection can contribute to reduced aggression in groups, and selection thus could be one way of reducing aggression in group housed mink. On this background, a selection experiment was started, aiming at reducing the number of bite marks on the skin side. This study describes variation in bite marks in the three generations. The study includes evaluation of bite marks on a total of 1986 mink in group housing. We hypothesise that bite marks might be influenced by both direct genetic effects and social genetic effects. Direct genetic effects refers to the effect of the animals own genotype and social effects refer to the effects of the genotype of the other animal in the group. Both direct and social genetic effects contribute to the variation in bite-marks in mink. Social genetic effect and the covariance between direct and social genetic effect explains more than 5 times the variation in bite marks explained by direct genetic effect. Thisis true in bite marks for the neck, body, and tail region as well as for the average of these regions. Therefore selection which take in to account social genetic effect will be successful to decrease bite marks in mink.
机译:有几种物种(例如家禽)的证据表明,选择可以减少群体中的侵略性,因此选择可能是减少成组水貂中侵略性的一种方法。在这种背景下,开始了选择实验,旨在减少皮肤一侧的咬痕。这项研究描述了三代中咬痕的变化。该研究包括对总共1986只貂皮的咬痕评估。我们假设咬痕可能受到直接遗传效应和社会遗传效应的影响。直接遗传效应是指动物自身基因型的影响,而社会效应是指组中另一只动物的基因型的影响。直接的遗传效应和社会的遗传效应都有助于貂皮咬痕的变化。社会遗传效应以及直接遗传效应和社会遗传效应之间的协方差解释了由直接遗传效应解释的咬痕变化的5倍以上。颈部,身体和尾巴区域以及这些区域的平均值的咬痕确实如此。因此,考虑到社会遗传效应的选择将成功减少水貂的咬痕。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号