首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. >Quinupristin-dalfopristin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia: efficacy and development of resistance.
【24h】

Quinupristin-dalfopristin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia: efficacy and development of resistance.

机译:奎奴普林汀-达福普汀与利奈唑胺治疗耐万古霉素的粪肠球菌菌血症:疗效和耐药性的发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid are widely used for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) infections. Increasing resistance of VREF to quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid is a cause for concern. To determine the efficacy of and the rate of development of resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid, we analyzed all episodes of clinically significant VREF bacteraemia at a tertiary-care hospital from January 2003 to June 2007. The main outcomes were rates of 30-day mortality, microbiological response, and development of resistance. Fifty-two patients were treated with quinupristin-dalfopristin and 61 were treated with linezolid. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. There were no significant between-group differences in 30-day mortality (48% in the quinupristin-dalfopristin group vs 41% in the linezolid group; p = 0.45) or microbiological response (60% vs 66%; p = 0.51). However, prolonged bacteraemia (18% of 45 evaluable cases vs 4% of 55 evaluable cases; p = 0.04) and development of resistance in blood isolates (11% vs 0%; p = 0.02) were more frequently observed in the quinupristin-dalfopristin group than in the linezolid group. There was no significant difference between the efficacy of quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid. However, prolonged bacteraemia and the development of resistance were more common in quinupristin-dalfopristin-treated patients.
机译:奎奴普丁-达福普汀和利奈唑胺广泛用于治疗耐万古霉素的粪肠球菌(VREF)感染。 VREF对奎奴普丁-达福普汀和利奈唑胺的耐药性增加值得关注。为了确定奎奴普丁-达福普汀和利奈唑胺的疗效和耐药率,我们分析了一家三级医院从2003年1月至2007年6月所有具有临床意义的VREF菌血症的发作情况。主要结局为30天死亡率,微生物反应和耐药性的发展。 52例接受奎奴普丁-达福普汀治疗,61例接受利奈唑胺治疗。两组之间的基线人口统计学和临床​​特征相似。 30天死亡率(奎奴普丁-达福普汀组48%,利奈唑胺组41%; p = 0.45)或微生物反应(60%vs 66%; p = 0.51)在组间无显着差异。然而,在奎奴普丁-达福普司汀中更经常观察到延长的菌血症(45例可评估病例中的18%vs 55例可评估病例中的4%; p = 0.04)和血液分离株的耐药性发展(11%vs 0%; p = 0.02)。组比利奈唑胺组。奎奴普丁-达福普汀和利奈唑胺的疗效之间无显着差异。但是,奎奴普丁-达福普汀治疗的患者长期菌血症和耐药性的发生更为普遍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号