【24h】

Commentary: Culture wars

机译:评论:文化大战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In "Of Shadows and white scarves," [August], M.L. Cummings misses the mark in her attempt to "set the record straight" in the unmanned air system debate. She implies that the U.S. Air Force relies heavily, if not exclusively, on officer pilots to operate its fleet of unmanned aircraft, and then argues that this is neither necessary nor effective, as evidenced by the Army's UAS program, which she compares favorably with that of the Air Force. Cummings is right that unmanned aircraft have different crew requirements than manned aircraft, but, depending on the nature of the tasks to be performed by the aircraft, there still is a need for officer pilots. Flying unmanned aircraft together with F-16CJs, F/A-18s, F-15Es and B-1s as an integrated strike package requires skills and situational awareness that enlisted UAS operators who are tethered to small Army units can never develop. In short, Cummings fails to appreciate the breadth of the Air Force's mission and vision as compared to that of the Army's. Furthermore, Cummings is flat-out wrong to say the Army UAS program is more effective.
机译:M.L.在[八月]的《阴影与白色围巾》中卡明斯在无人驾驶航空系统辩论中试图“打破常规”的尝试没有兑现。她暗示,美国空军在很大程度上(甚至不仅仅)依赖军官飞行员来操作其无人驾驶飞机机队,然后指出,这既没有必要也没有效果,正如陆军的UAS计划所证明的那样,她对此表示赞同。空军。卡明斯是对的,无人驾驶飞机的人员要求与无人驾驶飞机不同,但是根据飞机要执行的任务的性质,仍然需要高级飞行员。将无人飞机与F-16CJ,F / A-18,F-15E和B-1一起作为综合打击包进行飞行,需要技能和态势感知,而被束缚在小型陆军部队中的UAS运营商永远无法发展。简而言之,卡明斯没有意识到空军的任务和视野与陆军相比。此外,卡明斯认为陆军UAS计划更有效是完全错误的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号