首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : >Patterns of coronary artery ectasia and short-term outcome in acute myocardial infarction
【24h】

Patterns of coronary artery ectasia and short-term outcome in acute myocardial infarction

机译:急性心肌梗死的冠状动脉扩张模式和近期预后

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective. To assess the relationship between hematological inflammatory signs, cardiovascular risk (CV) factors and prognosis in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and coronary artery ectasia (CAE). Design. We investigated 3321 AMI patients who required urgent primary percutaneous intervention in two centres in the United Kingdom between January 2009 and August 2012. Thirty patients with CAE were compared with 60 age-And gender-matched controls. Blood was collected within 2 h of the onset of chest pain. CV risk factors were assessed from the records. Major acute cardiac events and/or mortality (MACE) over 2 years were documented. Results. CAE occurred in 2.7% and more often affected the right (RCA) (p = 0.001) and left circumflex artery (LCx) (0.0001). Culprit lesions were more frequently related to atherosclerosis in non-CAE patients (p = 0.001). Yet, CV risk factors failed to differentiate between the groups, except diabetes, which was less frequent in CAE (p = 0.02). CRP was higher in CAE (p = 0.006), whereas total leucocyte, neutrophil counts and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (N/L ratio) were lower (p = 0.002, 0.002 and 0.032, respectively) than among non-CAE. This also was the case in diffuse versus localised CAE (p = 0.02, 0.008 and 0.03, respectively). The MACE incidence did not differ between CAE and non-CAE (p = 0.083) patients, and clinical management and MACE were unrelated to the inflammatory markers. Conclusion. In AMI, patients with CAE commonly have aneurysmal changes in RCA and LCx, and their inflammatory responses differ from those with non-CAE. These differences did not have prognostic relevance, and do not suggest different management.
机译:目的。评估急性心肌梗死(AMI)和冠状动脉扩张(CAE)患者的血液炎症信号,心血管风险(CV)因素与预后之间的关系。设计。我们在2009年1月至2012年8月间在英国的两个中心调查了需要紧急初级经皮介入治疗的3321名AMI患者。将30例CAE患者与60个年龄和性别匹配的对照进行了比较。胸痛发作后2小时内收集血液。从记录中评估了简历风险因素。记录了两年内的重大急性心脏事件和/或死亡率(MACE)。结果。 CAE发生率为2.7%,更常见于右(RCA)(p = 0.001)和左回旋动脉(LCx)(0.0001)。在非CAE患者中,罪犯病变与动脉粥样硬化的相关性更高(p = 0.001)。然而,除了糖尿病,CV危险因素未能在两组之间进行区分,而在CAE中,糖尿病的发生率较低(p = 0.02)。 CAE中的CRP较高(p = 0.006),而白细胞,中性粒细胞总数和中性白细胞/淋巴细胞比率(N / L比率)较低(分别为p = 0.002、0.002和0.032),低于非CAE。在漫射与局部CAE中也是如此(分别为p = 0.02、0.008和0.03)。 CAE和非CAE患者之间的MACE发生率无差异(p = 0.083),临床治疗和MACE与炎症标志物无关。结论。在AMI中,CAE患者通常在RCA和LCx中有动脉瘤的改变,其炎症反应与非CAE患者不同。这些差异没有预后相关性,也没有建议不同的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号