...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences. >Consumer satisfaction among patients and their general practitioners about involving nurse specialists in primary care for patients with urinary incontinence
【24h】

Consumer satisfaction among patients and their general practitioners about involving nurse specialists in primary care for patients with urinary incontinence

机译:患者及其全科医生对护士专家参与尿失禁患者初级保健的消费者满意度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a very common problem, but existing guidelines on UI are not followed. To bring care in line with guidelines, we planned an intervention to involve nurse specialists on UI in primary care and assessed this in a randomised controlled trial. Alongside this intervention, we assessed consumer satisfaction among patients and general practitioners (GPs). Methods: Patients' satisfaction with the care provided by either nurse specialists (intervention group) or GPs (control group), respectively, was measured with a self-completed questionnaire. GPs' views on the involvement of nurse specialists were measured in a structured telephone interview. Results: The patient satisfaction score on the care offered by nurse specialists was 8.4 (scale 1-10), vs. 6.7 for care-as-usual by GPs. Over 85% of patients would recommend nurse specialist care to their best friends and 77% of the GPs considered the role of the nurse specialist to be beneficial, giving it a mean score of 7.2. Conclusions: Although the sample was relatively small and the stability of the results only provisionally established, substituting UI care from GP to nurse specialist appears to be welcomed by both patients and GPs. Small changes like giving additional UI-specific information and devoting more attention to UI (which had been given little attention before) would provide a simple instrument to stimulate patients to change their behaviour in the right direction.
机译:尿失禁(UI)是一个非常普遍的问题,但是未遵循有关UI的现有指南。为了使护理与指导方针保持一致,我们计划进行干预,以使UI方面的护士专家参与初级护理,并在一项随机对照试验中对此进行评估。除了这种干预措施,我们还评估了患者和全科医生(GP)的消费者满意度。方法:使用自我完成的问卷来评估患者对护士专家(干预组)或全科医生(对照组)分别提供的护理的满意度。全科医生对护士专家参与的观点是通过结构性电话采访来衡量的。结果:护士专家提供的护理的患者满意度得分为8.4(1-10级),而全科医生的照护得分为6.7。超过85%的患者会向其最好的朋友推荐护理专家,而77%的全科医生认为护理专家的作用是有益的,平均得分为7.2。结论:尽管样本量相对较小并且仅临时确定了结果的稳定性,但患者和全科医生都欢迎将UI护理从GP转到护理专家。进行一些细微的更改(例如提供其他特定于UI的信息并更加关注UI(以前很少关注))将提供一种简单的工具来刺激患者朝正确的方向改变其行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号