首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of public health >Evidence-based knowledge in the context of social practice
【24h】

Evidence-based knowledge in the context of social practice

机译:社会实践背景下的循证知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aims: Social practitioners require evidence-based knowledge as a guide to the development of social policies and practices. This article aims to identify: (1) knowledge domains needed for the development and use of evidence-based knowledge in social practice; (2) promising research methods for such knowledge development; (3) a framework for linking evidence-based practice, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines, as well as standards for systematic reviews and guidelines; (4) issues influencing use of evidence-based knowledge in social practice. Methods: This analysis is based on examination of conceptualisations of social practice in a transdisciplinary, evidence-based practice context. Also examined are recent national level reports pertaining to comparative effectiveness research. Results:This review identifies key knowledge domains pertinent to a transdisciplinary systems conceptualisation of evidence-based practice and promising comparative effectiveness research methods pertaining to those domains. An integrative conceptualisation of evidence-based practice is proposed including linkages to systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Conclusions: The development of evidence-based knowledge for social practice can benefit from the use of comparative effectiveness research strategies using a range of research methods tailored to specific questions and resource requirements, and which examine effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. An integrating conceptualisation of evidence-based practice that includes a linked process including planned and targeted systematic reviews and guideline development for decision making is needed to facilitate knowledge development and use. Evidence-based research regarding social intervention outcomes can benefit by using conceptual models that view intervention effects as contingent on sets of interacting domains including environmental, organisational, intervenes client-system, technology, and technique variables.
机译:目的:社会工作者需要循证知识作为社会政策和实践发展的指南。本文旨在确定:(1)在社会实践中发展和使用循证知识所需的知识领域; (2)有前途的研究方法,以促进这种知识的发展; (3)将基于证据的实践,系统评价和实践指南以及系统评价和指南的标准联系起来的框架; (4)影响在社会实践中使用循证知识的问题。方法:该分析基于对跨学科,循证实践环境中社会实践概念的考察。还审查了有关比较有效性研究的最新国家级报告。结果:本综述确定了与跨学科系统的循证实践概念化相关的关键知识领域,并提出了与这些领域相关的有希望的比较有效性研究方法。提出了基于证据的实践的综合概念,包括与系统评价和实践指南的链接。结论:针对社会实践的循证知识的发展可以受益于使用比较有效性研究策略,该策略使用了针对特定问题和资源需求量身定制的一系列研究方法,并检验了有效性和成本效益。需要一个基于证据的实践的整合概念,包括一个链接的过程,包括计划的和有针对性的系统评价以及决策制定指南,以促进知识的开发和使用。关于社会干预结果的基于证据的研究可以通过使用概念模型来受益,这些模型将干预效果视与环境,组织,干预客户系统,技术和技术变量等相互作用领域的集合而定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号