首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of public health >Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared with neutral protamine hagedorn insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes using a basal-bolus regimen in Sweden.
【24h】

Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared with neutral protamine hagedorn insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes using a basal-bolus regimen in Sweden.

机译:在瑞典,采用基础推注方案评估了德特米尔胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白哈格德胰岛素相比的长期成本效益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: To evaluate the long-term clinical and economic outcomes associated with insulin detemir and neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin in combination with mealtime insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes in Sweden, based on data from a two-year, multi-national, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. METHODS: Insulin detemir was associated with significant improvements in glycaemic control after 24 months (HbA1c 7.36% versus 7.58%, mean difference -0.22%, p = 0.022) and major hypoglycaemic events (69% risk reduction, p = 0.001) versus NPH. Patients treated with detemir gained less weight (1.7 versus 2.7 kg, P = 0.024). Based on these findings, a published and validated computer model (IMS CORE Diabetes Model) was used to estimate life-expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy and both direct medical costs and indirect costs. RESULTS: Basal-bolus therapy with insulin detemir was projected to improve life expectancy by 0.14 years (15.02 +/- 0.19 versus 14.88 +/- 0.18 years) and quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.53 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus NPH (8.35 +/- 0.11 versus 7.82 +/- 0.10 QALYs). Improvements in QALYs were driven by avoided or delayed diabetes-related complications and fewer hypoglycaemic events. Direct medical costs over patient lifetimes were SEK 26,144 higher in the insulin detemir arm (SEK 995,025 +/- 19,580 versus 968,881 +/- 19,769), leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of SEK 49,757 per QALY gained. Capturing indirect costs led to insulin detemir being cost saving over patient lifetimes, by SEK 80,113, compared to NPH (SEK 2,959,909 +/- 64,727 versus 3,040,022 +/- 62,317). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NPH, insulin detemir is likely to be cost-effective from a healthcare payer perspective and dominant from a societal perspective in patients with type 1 diabetes in Sweden.
机译:目的:根据两年期,长期随访的数据,评估瑞典1型糖尿病患者与Detemir胰岛素和中性鱼精蛋白哈格多恩(NPH)胰岛素联合进餐时摄取的门冬胰岛素相关的长期临床和经济结果全国性,开放标签,随机,对照试验。方法:地特胰岛素与24个月后血糖控制显着改善(HbA1c 7.36%比7.58%,平均差异-0.22%,p = 0.022)和主要的降血糖事件(降低69%的风险,p = 0.001)相对于NPH。接受德特米尔治疗的患者体重减轻(1.7公斤和2.7公斤,P = 0.024)。基于这些发现,使用已发布并经过验证的计算机模型(IMS CORE糖尿病模型)来估计预期寿命,质量调整后的预期寿命以及直接医疗费用和间接费用。结果:底特胰岛素胰岛素推注治疗预计可将预期寿命延长0.14年(15.02 +/- 0.19对14.88 +/- 0.18岁),将质量调整后的预期寿命与NPH相比可提高0.53年质量调整后的寿命(QALYs) (8.35 +/- 0.11与7.82 +/- 0.10 QALYs)。避免或延迟与糖尿病相关的并发症和更少的降血糖事件,推动了QALYs的改善。地特胰岛素组在患者一生中的直接医疗费用增加了26,144瑞典克朗(995,025 +/- 19,580瑞典克朗对968,881 +/- 19,769瑞典克朗),从而使每QALY的成本效益比增加了49,757瑞典克朗。与NPH相比,捕获间接成本导致德替米尔胰岛素在患者一生中的成本节省了80,113瑞典克朗(2,959,909 +/- 64,727瑞典克朗,而3,040,022 +/- 62,317瑞典克朗)。结论:与NPH相比,在瑞典的1型糖尿病患者中,从医疗保健付款人的角度来看,胰岛素地特米尔可能具有成本效益,从社会角度而言,地特胰岛素占主导地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号