首页> 外文期刊>Organic process research & development >Reply to Comment on 'Optimisation of the Linear Alkyl Benzene Sulfonation Process for Surfactant Manufacture' and 'Sulfonation Technology for Anionic Surfactant Manufacture':Falling Film SO_3 Sulfonation - Laminar or Turbulent Flow Controversy
【24h】

Reply to Comment on 'Optimisation of the Linear Alkyl Benzene Sulfonation Process for Surfactant Manufacture' and 'Sulfonation Technology for Anionic Surfactant Manufacture':Falling Film SO_3 Sulfonation - Laminar or Turbulent Flow Controversy

机译:对“优化表面活性剂生产的线性烷基苯磺化工艺”和“阴离子表面活性剂生产的磺化技术”的评论的评论:降膜SO_3磺化-层流或湍流争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I have studied the letter by Edward Knaggs,whom I have never met but whom I "know" and respect from his massive reputation in sulphonation.I think the issue between us is mainly a matter of definition rather than of substance.I maintain that the film flow is not "pure turbulent"-if it were,then we would have plug flow and a very sharply peaked residence time distribution,and I do not think Knaggs is claiming that it is pure turbulent in that sense.Knaggs argues that the film flow is not "pure laminar",that is there is some turbulence:I would agree with that,and I do say that in the two papers he comments on.However,if I were to write these papers again,I think I would want to make it clearer that without the turbulence contribution,which is more significant than the wording of my papers might perhaps imply(particularly in the upper part of the reactor),the reaction exotherm would not be removed efficiently.
机译:我研究过爱德华·克纳格斯(Edward Knaggs)的那封信,我从未见过他,但我从他在磺化方面的声誉中得到“认识”和尊重。我认为我们之间的问题主要是定义问题,而非实质问题。膜流不是“纯湍流”-如果是这样,那么我们将产生塞流和非常陡峭的停留时间分布,而且我不认为克纳格斯声称它在这种意义上是纯湍流。流动不是“纯粹的层流”,那是有一些动荡的:我同意这一点,我的确在他评论的两篇论文中说过。但是,如果我要再次写这些论文,我想我会为了更清楚地表明,如果没有湍流贡献(比我的论文的措辞可能更有意义)(特别是在反应堆的上部),反应放热将无法有效消除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号