...
首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >Boosting correct and appropriate booster seat use in Australia
【24h】

Boosting correct and appropriate booster seat use in Australia

机译:促进在澳大利亚正确和适当地使用辅助座椅

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The main aims of the current study were to (1) investigate misuse and/or inappropriate use across different booster seat types (including high back booster seats, booster seat cushions, and booster seats/cushions used in combination with an H-harness) through an Australian CRS/booster seat inspection program conducted between October 2004 and October 2011, and (2) determine whether misuse and/or inappropriate use across booster seat types changed following the introduction in 2009 of new Australian CRS/booster seat and motor vehicle restraint use legislation for children aged 7 years and under. Results reveal high levels of booster seat misuse among booster seats (including high back booster seats, booster seat cushions, and booster seats/cushions used in combination with an H-harness) installed in Australian motor vehicles that present at CRS inspection clinics. Of all the booster seats inspected, almost two thirds (62%) were reported as having at least one instance of misuse, with almost all aspects of the booster seat misused in some way. Misuse was highest for booster seats/cushions used in combination with an H-harness (84%), compared to booster cushions (63%) and high back booster seats (55%). Of the 792 booster seats inspected, 673 (85%) were inspected before, and 119 (15%) were inspected following, the introduction of the new CRS legislation. While it was not possible to ensure similarity between components of the sample observed in the pre- and post-legislation periods, significantly more misuse and inappropriate use was observed in the post-legislation component of the sample. For example, inappropriate booster seat use increased significantly across the pre- and post-legislation periods (5% vs. 9%, χ~2(1) = 4.719, p < 0.05). In addition, there were significantly more: H-harness errors (17% vs. 55%), missing gated buckles/locking clips (12% vs. 29%), tether errors (3% vs. 13%) and anchor errors (3% vs. 8%). These findings highlight the need for more targeted CRS/booster seat education to complement legislative changes, including information on correct and appropriate booster seat use in order to maximise the level of specialised protection provided by the CRS/booster seat for child vehicle occupants in the event of a crash.
机译:当前研究的主要目的是(1)通过以下方式调查不同增高座椅类型(包括高背增高座椅,增高座椅垫和与H型线束结合使用的增高座椅/靠垫)的误用和/或不当使用情况在2004年10月至2011年10月之间进行的澳大利亚CRS /助力座椅检查计划,以及(2)确定自2009年引入新的澳大利亚CRS /助力座椅和机动车辆约束装置以来,各种增高座椅类型的误用和/或不当使用是否发生了变化7岁及以下儿童的立法。结果显示,安装在CRS检查诊所的澳大利亚机动车中,加高座椅(包括高背加高座椅,加高座椅坐垫以及与H型线束结合使用的加高座椅/靠垫)之间的加高座椅滥用程度很高。在检查的所有增高座椅中,几乎三分之二(62%)据报告至少有一个滥用案例,几乎所有方面都以某种方式滥用了增高座椅。与增高坐垫(63%)和高靠背增高座椅(55%)组合使用的增高座椅/靠垫与H型线束组合使用的滥用率最高(84%)。在引入新的CRS法规之后,在检查的792个增高座椅中,有673个(占85%)被检查过,119个(占15%)被检查了。虽然无法确保在立法前和立法后期间观察到的样本成分之间的相似性,但在立法后的样本中观察到明显更多的滥用和不当使用。例如,在立法前后,不适当的加高座椅使用率显着增加(5%对9%,χ〜2(1)= 4.719,p <0.05)。此外,还有更多的信息:水平线束错误(17%比55%),门锁扣/锁夹丢失(12%比29%),系绳错误(3%比13%)和锚点错误( 3%和8%)。这些发现突出表明,需要对CRS /助推器座椅进行更有针对性的教育,以补充立法变化,包括有关正确和适当使用增高椅的信息,以最大程度地在事件发生时最大程度地提高CRS /助推器座椅为儿童乘员提供的专业保护水平崩溃

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号