...
首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >Practical tool and procedure for workplace risk assessment: Evidence from SMEs in Estonia
【24h】

Practical tool and procedure for workplace risk assessment: Evidence from SMEs in Estonia

机译:工作场所风险评估的实用工具和程序:爱沙尼亚中小型企业的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study focuses on a successful risk assessment procedure in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) where occupational health and safety resources may be less accessible than in larger companies with more labour force, time, knowledge and technology. An original approach is offered for an easy and unambiguous assessment of occupational hazards (physical, chemical and biological) and evidence from 18 industrial SMEs from different branches of industries are presented. In order to evaluate employers' and employees' attitudes and perceptions towards health and safety, safety interviews in eight enterprises were conducted. The results showed that in most cases participants' attitudes in the enterprises towards contributing to safety were overall positive: developing safety procedures and practices, written work procedures and safety instructions, providing personal protective equipment, etc. The study identified important safety deficiencies such as the absence of a safety policy; insufficient safety training and unrealistic daily required work load. The measurement results showed that conditions of the working environment varied between,companies as well as between the branches of industries. The main identified hazards which exceeded occupational exposure limits were: wood dust in wood processing industry, chemicals and noise in wood processing and mechanical industry, and lighting in mechanical, plastic and printing industry. The authors' developed flexible risk assessment tool was successfully implemented in all investigated SMEs and received positive feedback from the enterprises as an applicable and suitable tool for SME's, where skills and resources are limited. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的重点是在中小型企业(SME)中成功进行风险评估的程序,与拥有更多劳动力,时间,知识和技术的大型公司相比,中小型企业可能无法获得职业健康和安全资源。提供了一种简单,明确的职业危害(物理,化学和生物危害)评估方法,并提供了来自不同行业分支机构的18家工业中小企业的证据。为了评估雇主和雇员对健康和安全的态度和看法,对八家企业进行了安全访谈。结果表明,在大多数情况下,企业参与者对安全做出贡献的态度总体上是积极的:制定安全程序和实践,书面工作程序和安全说明,提供个人防护设备等。研究发现了重要的安全缺陷,例如安全隐患。缺乏安全政策;安全培训不足,日常工作量不切实际。测量结果表明,工作环境的条件在公司之间以及各行业分支之间都不同。超过职业接触限值的主要危害是:木材加工行业的木屑,木材加工和机械行业的化学物质和噪音,以及机械,塑料和印刷行业的照明。作者开发的灵活的风险评估工具已在所有受调查的SME中成功实施,并获得了企业的积极反馈,这是适用于技能和资源有限的SME的适用工具。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号