首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology >Oral oxycodone hydrochloride versus epidural anaesthesia for pain control after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
【24h】

Oral oxycodone hydrochloride versus epidural anaesthesia for pain control after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

机译:盐酸羟考酮与硬膜外麻醉用于根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术后的疼痛控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether combined oral intake of paracetamol (4 x 1 g) + oxycodone hydrochloride (2x10 mg) is adequate and equivalent to epidural anaesthesia (EDA) with respect to postoperative pain control and postoperative mobilization after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients scheduled for RRP were randomized to either: EDA with ropivacaine + paracetamol (4 x 1 g tablet) + injected or oral morphine on demand (EDA group); or infiltration of 25-40 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine into the wound + oxycodone hydrochloride (2 x 10 mg tablet) + paracetamol (4x1 g tablet) + injected or oral morphine on demand (OXY group). The groups were compared with respect to pain control determined by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS), time to free mobilization, hospital stay, complications, operation time and bleeding. RESULTS: Both analgesic regimens provided satisfactory analgesia, i.e. VAS scores remained significantly below 4 (p<0.0001). The EDA group experienced slightly less pain than the OXY group on the operation day but this was not significant: median VAS scores of 0.7 and 1.8, respectively (p=0.27). Median VAS scores during hospital stay were 1.7 in both treatment groups. VAS scores ranged from 0.1 to 3.3 and from 0.2 to 3.5 in the EDA and OXY groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative mobilization between the groups (p=0.06). The median duration of hospital stay was 3 nights in both groups. CONCLUSION: Postoperative pain control after RRP with oral oxycodone hydrochloride, paracetamol and extra morphine on demand is preferable to EDA when pain control as well as mobilization and costs are taken into account.
机译:目的:评估在术后耻骨根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)后的术后疼痛控制和术后动员方面,口服对乙酰氨基酚(4 x 1 g)+盐酸羟可待酮(2x10 mg)的联合口服摄入量是否足够并等效于硬膜外麻醉(EDA)。材料与方法:连续40例接受RRP的患者被随机分为:罗哌卡因+扑热息痛(4 x 1 g片剂)+按需注射或口服吗啡的EDA(EDA组);或将25-40 ml的0.25%布比卡因渗入伤口+盐酸羟考酮(2 x 10 mg片剂)+扑热息痛(4x1 g片剂)+按需注射或口服吗啡(OXY组)。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS),自由活动时间,住院时间,并发症,手术时间和出血来比较各组的疼痛控制。结果:两种镇痛方案均提供令人满意的镇痛效果,即VAS评分仍显着低于4(p <0.0001)。手术当天,EDA组的疼痛较OXY组略少,但这并不明显:VAS中位评分分别为0.7和1.8(p = 0.27)。两个治疗组的住院期间VAS评分中位数均为1.7。在EDA和OXY组中,VAS分数分别为0.1到3.3和0.2到3.5。两组之间的术后动员没有显着差异(p = 0.06)。两组的平均住院时间均为3晚。结论:考虑到疼痛控制以及动员和费用,在需要RRP后口服盐酸羟可待酮,对乙酰氨基酚和额外的吗啡进行术后疼痛控制比EDA更可取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号