...
首页> 外文期刊>SAMPE Journal >Guest Editor Column
【24h】

Guest Editor Column

机译:来宾编辑专栏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It always helps to look at past responses as a way to understand how industries respond to change. You also have to be on the lookout for fundamentals that alter the industry key characteristics. In the case of carbon fibers there are three examples of industry change. First, the defense buildup under President Reagan in the 1980's caused a significant expansion in demand. The volumes of fiber needed for the SICBM, stealth bomber, stealth fighter(s), etc. were in excess of what the industry could produce. There were discussions about where to produce the precursor fibers. The industry responded with few firm purchase guarantees in hand. Hundreds of millions of dollars were invested in new capacity by 1990. However with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet threat, the defense programs were slowed or dropped. Carbon fiber demand dropped sharply and by 1992 producers were shutting down facilities or quitting the industry (Asahi Chemical, BASF) due to the lack of profitability. Prices for fiber dropped sharply. The levy prices did stimulate growth in sporting goods and industrial end-uses. But the pricing was too low to justify new carbon fiber capacity construction.
机译:它始终有助于将过去的反应视为了解行业如何响应变化的一种方式。您还必须注意那些会改变行业关键特性的基本原理。就碳纤维而言,存在三个行业变革的例子。首先,1980年代里根总统领导下的国防建设导致需求大幅度增长。 SICBM,隐形轰炸机,隐形战斗机等所需的纤维量超出了该行业的生产能力。关于在哪里生产前体纤维的讨论。该行业几乎没有手头的购买保证。到1990年,数亿美元的资金投入了新的产能。然而,随着柏林墙的倒塌和苏联威胁的瓦解,国防计划被放慢或放弃。碳纤维需求急剧下降,到1992年,由于缺乏盈利能力,生产商关闭了工厂或退出了该行业(Asahi Chemical,BASF)。纤维价格急剧下跌。征收价格的确刺激了体育用品和工业最终用途的增长。但是价格太低,不足以证明新的碳纤维产能建设是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号