...
首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia bulletin >Long-acting injectable vs oral antipsychotics for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
【24h】

Long-acting injectable vs oral antipsychotics for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

机译:长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药预防精神分裂症复发:一项随机试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: While long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are hoped to reduce high relapse rates in schizophrenia, recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) challenged the benefits of LAIs over oral antipsychotics (OAPs). Methods: Systematic review/meta-analysis of RCTs that lasted ≥6 months comparing LAIs and OAPs. Primary outcome was study-defined relapse at the longest time point; secondary outcomes included relapse at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, all-cause discontinuation, discontinuation due to adverse events, drug inefficacy (ie, relapse + discontinuation due to inefficacy), hospitalization, and nonadherence. Results: Across 21 RCTs (n = 5176), LAIs were similar to OAPs for relapse prevention at the longest time point (studies = 21, n = 4950, relative risk [RR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-1.08, P =. 35). The finding was confirmed restricting the analysis to outpatient studies lasting ≥1 year (studies = 12, RR = 0.93, 95% CI:0.71-1.07, P =. 31). However, studies using first-generation antipsychotic (FGA)-LAIs (studies = 10, RR = 0.82, 95% CI:0.69-0.97, P =. 02) and those published ≤1991 (consisting exclusively of all 8 fluphenazine-LAI studies; RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65-0.96, P = 0.02) were superior to OAPs regarding the primary outcome. Pooled LAIs also did not separate from OAPs regarding any secondary outcomes. Again, studies using FGA-LAIs and those published ≤1991 were associated with LAI superiority over OAPs, eg, hospitalization and drug inefficacy. Conclusions: In RCTs, which are less representative of real-world patients than naturalistic studies, pooled LAIs did not reduce relapse compared with OAPs in schizophrenia patients. The exceptions were FGA-LAIs, mostly consisting of fluphenazine-LAI studies, which were all conducted through 1991. Because this finding is vulnerable to a cohort bias, studies comparing FGA-LAI vs second-generation antipsychotics-LAI and LAI vs OAP RCTs in real-world patients are needed.
机译:背景:虽然长效注射抗精神病药(LAIs)有望减少精神分裂症的高复发率,但最近的随机对照试验(RCT)挑战了LAI优于口服抗精神病药(OAPs)的益处。方法:比较LAI和OAP,对≥6个月的RCT进行系统评价/元分析。主要结果是研究定义的最长时间点复发。次要结局包括3、6、12、18和24个月复发,全因停药,由于不良事件而停药,药物无效(即复发+因无效而停药),住院和不依从。结果:在21个RCT(n = 5176)中,LAI类似于OAP在最长的时间点上预防复发(研究= 21,n = 4950,相对风险[RR] = 0.93,95%置信区间[CI]:0.80) -1.08,P =。35)。证实了这一发现,将分析限制为持续≥1年的门诊研究(研究= 12,RR = 0.93,95%CI:0.71-1.07,P =。31)。但是,使用第一代抗精神病药(FGA)-LAI进行的研究(研究= 10,RR = 0.82,95%CI:0.69-0.97,P =。02),且发表于1991年≤2001年(仅包括全部8份氟奋乃静-LAI研究; RR = 0.79,95%CI:0.65-0.96,P = 0.02)在主要结局方面优于OAP。就任何次要结果而言,合并的LAI也未与OAP分开。同样,使用FGA-LAI的研究和≤1991年发表的研究与LAI优于OAP的研究相关,例如住院和药物无效。结论:在RCTs中,对现实世界患者的代表性不如对自然主义研究的研究,与OAPs相比,在精神分裂症患者中,合并的LAIs没有降低复发率。例外情况是FGA-LAI,主要由fluphenazine-LAI研究组成,这些研究都一直进行到1991年。由于这一发现很容易受到队列偏倚的影响,因此比较了FGA-LAI与第二代抗精神病药物-LAI以及LAI与OAP RCT的比较研究。需要真实世界的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号