首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia bulletin >Use of force preferences and perceived effectiveness of actions among Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) police officers and non-CIT officers in an escalating psychiatric crisis involving a subject with schizophrenia.
【24h】

Use of force preferences and perceived effectiveness of actions among Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) police officers and non-CIT officers in an escalating psychiatric crisis involving a subject with schizophrenia.

机译:危机干预小组(CIT)警务人员和非CIT警务人员在涉及精神分裂症患者的不断升级的精神疾病危机中使用武力偏好和行动的感知效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Few studies have examined police officers' use of force toward individuals with schizophrenia, despite the widely disseminated Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) model of partnership between mental health and law enforcement that seeks to reduce use of force and enhance safety of officers and individuals with mental illnesses. This study tested the hypotheses that CIT-trained officers would select a lower level of force, identify nonphysical actions as more effective, and perceive physical force as less effective in an escalating psychiatric crisis, compared with non-CIT-trained officers. Methods: Police officers (n = 135)-48 CIT trained and 87 non-CIT trained-completed a survey containing 3 scenario-based vignettes depicting an escalating situation involving a subject with psychosis. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance. Results: Officers escalated their preferred actions across the scenarios. A significant scenario by group interaction indicated that CIT-trained officers chose less escalation (ie, opting for less force at the third scenario) than non-CIT-trained officers. Officers reported decreasing perceived effectiveness of nonphysical action across the 3 scenarios. A significant scenario by group interaction indicated that CIT-trained officers reported a lesser decline in perceived effectiveness of nonphysical actions at the third scenario. CIT-trained officers consistently endorsed lower perceived effectiveness of physical force. Conclusions: Efforts are needed to reduce use of force toward individuals with psychotic disorders. These findings suggest that CIT may be an effective approach. In addition to clinical and programmatic implications, such findings demonstrate a role for clinicians, advocates, and schizophrenia researchers in promoting social justice through partnerships with diverse social sectors.
机译:背景:尽管精神卫生与执法部门之间广泛传播的危机干预小组(CIT)合作模型旨在减少使用武力并增强官员和个人的安全,但很少有研究检查过警官对精神分裂症患者使用武力的情况。患有精神疾病。这项研究检验了以下假设:与未接受CIT培训的军官相比,接受CIT培训的军官在逐步升级的精神病危机中将选择较低水平的武力,将非身体行为识别为更有效,而将体力识别为无效。方法:警察(n = 135)-48名经过CIT培训和87名非CIT培训完成了一项调查,其中包含3个基于情景的小插曲,描绘出涉及精神病患者的情况不断升级。使用方差的重复测量分析来分析数据。结果:官员在整个场景中上报了他们的首选行动。通过小组互动进行的重要情景表明,受过CIT培训的官员选择的升级程度(即,在第三种情况下选择较少的武力)要比未经CIT培训的官员选择的升级少。军官报告说,在这三种情况下,非身体活动的感知有效性降低。小组互动的一个重要场景表明,接受CIT培训的人员在第三种场景中,非身体行为的感知效率下降幅度较小。接受过CIT培训的官员始终认可较低的体力效力。结论:需要努力减少对精神病患者使用武力。这些发现表明,企业所得税可能是一种有效的方法。除了对临床和计划的影响外,这些发现还证明了临床医生,倡导者和精神分裂症研究人员在通过与不同社会部门的伙伴关系促进社会正义方面的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号